Ah ouais et ça se matérialise comment ?
En plus de ça elles sont beaucoup moins présentes que les hommes dans les sciences dures
En plus de ça elles sont beaucoup moins présentes que les hommes dans les sciences dures
Sponsorisé
Connectez-vous pour masquer les pubs
Sauf qu’on le sait déjà depuis longtemps
Lynn, R. (1994). “Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved”, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257-27
Les hommes ont en moyenne 10% de points de QI supplémentaires car plus gros cerveau
Lynn, R. (1994). “Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved”, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257-27
Les hommes ont en moyenne 10% de points de QI supplémentaires car plus gros cerveau
"Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved”, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257-27 " ça veux rien dire ça
Personalité and individual differences ? Ah ouais ? C'est juste un titre d'une étude ça non ? t'as trouver ça ou passe le lien
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Mais un seul c'est pas suffisant
Prout.
Je ne suis pas à ton service
Tu peux le faire toi même
Je n’ai jamais dit ça, mais si ça te fait plaisir d'inventer des choses que j'ai dites
Je n’ai jamais dit ça, mais si ça te fait plaisir d'inventer des choses que j'ai dites
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Ah ouais et ça se matérialise comment ?
En plus de ça elles sont beaucoup moins présentes que les hommes dans les sciences dures
En plus de ça elles sont beaucoup moins présentes que les hommes dans les sciences dures
Bah réfléchis, ça ne va pas se matérialiser avec le prix du lait qui augmente, c'est logique, c'est quoi cette question ?
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
"Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved”, Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257-27 " ça veux rien dire ça
Personalité and individual differences ? Ah ouais ? C'est juste un titre d'une étude ça non ? t'as trouver ça ou passe le lien
Benh c’est l’étude de référence sur le sujet
https://richardlynn.net/w[...]ds/2025/02/lynn1994-7.pdf
Le sujet a déjà été débattu en long et en travers
Les hommes sont plus grand, ont un plus gros cerveau donc sont plus intelligents
En plus d’avoir bénéficié d’une sélection plus drastique car pendant des millénaires la majorité des hommes ne se reproduisaient pas
Le sujet a déjà été débattu en long et en travers
Les hommes sont plus grand, ont un plus gros cerveau donc sont plus intelligents
En plus d’avoir bénéficié d’une sélection plus drastique car pendant des millénaires la majorité des hommes ne se reproduisaient pas
Benh c’est l’étude de référence sur le sujet
https://richardlynn.net/w[...]ds/2025/02/lynn1994-7.pdf
Le sujet a déjà été débattu en long et en travers
Les hommes sont plus grand, ont un plus gros cerveau donc sont plus intelligents
En plus d’avoir bénéficié d’une sélection plus drastique car pendant des millénaires la majorité des hommes ne se reproduisaient pas
Le sujet a déjà été débattu en long et en travers
Les hommes sont plus grand, ont un plus gros cerveau donc sont plus intelligents
En plus d’avoir bénéficié d’une sélection plus drastique car pendant des millénaires la majorité des hommes ne se reproduisaient pas
"From these two propositions it would be expected that males would have
a higher average level of intelligence than females. Yet it is invariably stated in text books that “gender
differences in general intellectual ability are small and virtually non-existent” (Brody, 1992, p. 323)
and “there are no overall differences in the scores obtained by males and females on intelligence tests”
(Halpern, 1992, p. 63). There seems to be a logical inconsistency between the findings of the larger
male brain, the association of brain size with intelligence and the absence of a sex difference in
intelligence which calls for resolution.
Ankney and Rushton propose different solutions to the paradox. Ankney accepts the generally held
view that there is no sex difference in general intelligence, and he also notes another generally accepted
view that females obtain higher means on verbal abilities while males obtain higher means on spatial
abilities (e.g. Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974; Hyde & Linn, 1988; Linn & Petersen, 1985; Halpern, 1992).
He apparently accepts that these relative male and female strengths in the verbal and spatial abilities
are counterbalanced so that they produce equal overall intelligence. The solution he proposes to the
paradox is that spatial ability may require more brain tissue than verbal ability. This is an ingenious
solution but there is no direct evidence to support it and there may be a simpler solution to the problem.
Such a simpler solution is proposed by Rushton. He questions the belief that males and females
have the same mean IQ. He cites the results of the standardization samples of the WISC-R in the United
States and Scotland (Jensen & Reynolds, 1983; Lynn & Mulhem, 1991), in both of which males
obtained slightly higher means for Full Scale IQ than females. However, the proposition that males
have a higher mean IQ than females runs counter to the consensus of opinion in the entire history of
intelligence testing and would certainly require the marshalling of a considerable amount of evidence
to sustain." Déjà, dans les premières lignes, on voit que c'est hyper bancale comme étude
a higher average level of intelligence than females. Yet it is invariably stated in text books that “gender
differences in general intellectual ability are small and virtually non-existent” (Brody, 1992, p. 323)
and “there are no overall differences in the scores obtained by males and females on intelligence tests”
(Halpern, 1992, p. 63). There seems to be a logical inconsistency between the findings of the larger
male brain, the association of brain size with intelligence and the absence of a sex difference in
intelligence which calls for resolution.
Ankney and Rushton propose different solutions to the paradox. Ankney accepts the generally held
view that there is no sex difference in general intelligence, and he also notes another generally accepted
view that females obtain higher means on verbal abilities while males obtain higher means on spatial
abilities (e.g. Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974; Hyde & Linn, 1988; Linn & Petersen, 1985; Halpern, 1992).
He apparently accepts that these relative male and female strengths in the verbal and spatial abilities
are counterbalanced so that they produce equal overall intelligence. The solution he proposes to the
paradox is that spatial ability may require more brain tissue than verbal ability. This is an ingenious
solution but there is no direct evidence to support it and there may be a simpler solution to the problem.
Such a simpler solution is proposed by Rushton. He questions the belief that males and females
have the same mean IQ. He cites the results of the standardization samples of the WISC-R in the United
States and Scotland (Jensen & Reynolds, 1983; Lynn & Mulhem, 1991), in both of which males
obtained slightly higher means for Full Scale IQ than females. However, the proposition that males
have a higher mean IQ than females runs counter to the consensus of opinion in the entire history of
intelligence testing and would certainly require the marshalling of a considerable amount of evidence
to sustain." Déjà, dans les premières lignes, on voit que c'est hyper bancale comme étude
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Qi extrêmement élevé pour le top
Et c’est qu’un domaine parmi d’autres
C’est un faux débat, les hommes dominent sur tout ce qui caractérise l’intelligence brute
Ça veut pas dire que les femmes sont inférieures mais c’est juste une réalité à ce niveau
Et c’est qu’un domaine parmi d’autres
C’est un faux débat, les hommes dominent sur tout ce qui caractérise l’intelligence brute
Ça veut pas dire que les femmes sont inférieures mais c’est juste une réalité à ce niveau
"Si dans toutes les critères de mesure d'intelligence les hommes dépassent la femme, c'est que les hommes sont meilleurs que les femmes" Est-ce seulement le cas ?
Prout.
Sponsorisé
Connectez-vous pour masquer les pubs"From these two propositions it would be expected that males would have
a higher average level of intelligence than females. Yet it is invariably stated in text books that “gender
differences in general intellectual ability are small and virtually non-existent” (Brody, 1992, p. 323)
and “there are no overall differences in the scores obtained by males and females on intelligence tests”
(Halpern, 1992, p. 63). There seems to be a logical inconsistency between the findings of the larger
male brain, the association of brain size with intelligence and the absence of a sex difference in
intelligence which calls for resolution.
Ankney and Rushton propose different solutions to the paradox. Ankney accepts the generally held
view that there is no sex difference in general intelligence, and he also notes another generally accepted
view that females obtain higher means on verbal abilities while males obtain higher means on spatial
abilities (e.g. Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974; Hyde & Linn, 1988; Linn & Petersen, 1985; Halpern, 1992).
He apparently accepts that these relative male and female strengths in the verbal and spatial abilities
are counterbalanced so that they produce equal overall intelligence. The solution he proposes to the
paradox is that spatial ability may require more brain tissue than verbal ability. This is an ingenious
solution but there is no direct evidence to support it and there may be a simpler solution to the problem.
Such a simpler solution is proposed by Rushton. He questions the belief that males and females
have the same mean IQ. He cites the results of the standardization samples of the WISC-R in the United
States and Scotland (Jensen & Reynolds, 1983; Lynn & Mulhem, 1991), in both of which males
obtained slightly higher means for Full Scale IQ than females. However, the proposition that males
have a higher mean IQ than females runs counter to the consensus of opinion in the entire history of
intelligence testing and would certainly require the marshalling of a considerable amount of evidence
to sustain." Déjà, dans les premières lignes, on voit que c'est hyper bancale comme étude
a higher average level of intelligence than females. Yet it is invariably stated in text books that “gender
differences in general intellectual ability are small and virtually non-existent” (Brody, 1992, p. 323)
and “there are no overall differences in the scores obtained by males and females on intelligence tests”
(Halpern, 1992, p. 63). There seems to be a logical inconsistency between the findings of the larger
male brain, the association of brain size with intelligence and the absence of a sex difference in
intelligence which calls for resolution.
Ankney and Rushton propose different solutions to the paradox. Ankney accepts the generally held
view that there is no sex difference in general intelligence, and he also notes another generally accepted
view that females obtain higher means on verbal abilities while males obtain higher means on spatial
abilities (e.g. Maccoby & Jacklin, 1974; Hyde & Linn, 1988; Linn & Petersen, 1985; Halpern, 1992).
He apparently accepts that these relative male and female strengths in the verbal and spatial abilities
are counterbalanced so that they produce equal overall intelligence. The solution he proposes to the
paradox is that spatial ability may require more brain tissue than verbal ability. This is an ingenious
solution but there is no direct evidence to support it and there may be a simpler solution to the problem.
Such a simpler solution is proposed by Rushton. He questions the belief that males and females
have the same mean IQ. He cites the results of the standardization samples of the WISC-R in the United
States and Scotland (Jensen & Reynolds, 1983; Lynn & Mulhem, 1991), in both of which males
obtained slightly higher means for Full Scale IQ than females. However, the proposition that males
have a higher mean IQ than females runs counter to the consensus of opinion in the entire history of
intelligence testing and would certainly require the marshalling of a considerable amount of evidence
to sustain." Déjà, dans les premières lignes, on voit que c'est hyper bancale comme étude
Rien de bancal et encore utilisé aujourd’hui
Les hommes ont en moyenne un cerveau plus volumineux,
et la taille du cerveau est corrélée au QI.
C’est marqué noir sur blanc et il n’y a pas que cette étude
C’est un faux sujet
Les hommes ont en moyenne un cerveau plus volumineux,
et la taille du cerveau est corrélée au QI.
C’est marqué noir sur blanc et il n’y a pas que cette étude
C’est un faux sujet
Énormément + hommes qui jouent au échecs pour en faire carrière sur les femmes
C'est comme quand on compare les médaillés olympiques d'un pays énorme comme les états unis à un plus petit pays comme l'Italie
C'est comme quand on compare les médaillés olympiques d'un pays énorme comme les états unis à un plus petit pays comme l'Italie
Prout.
Ni de faire du small talk comme une femme
Moins de capacités à élever une progéniture, pas d’instinct maternelle inée
Moins de capacités à élever une progéniture, pas d’instinct maternelle inée
Énormément + hommes qui jouent au échecs pour en faire carrière sur les femmes
C'est comme quand on compare les médaillés olympiques d'un pays énorme comme les états unis à un plus petit pays comme l'Italie
C'est comme quand on compare les médaillés olympiques d'un pays énorme comme les états unis à un plus petit pays comme l'Italie
Pour les olympiades de mathématiques, d’info, la recherche, les médailles, les prix Nobel ce que vous voulez les hommes dominent
Même les sujets plus abstraits comme l’art, la littérature, le cinéma
Trouvez juste un domaine qui caractérise l’intelligence ou les femmes dominent objectivement les hommes
Même les sujets plus abstraits comme l’art, la littérature, le cinéma
Trouvez juste un domaine qui caractérise l’intelligence ou les femmes dominent objectivement les hommes
Rien de bancal et encore utilisé aujourd’hui
Les hommes ont en moyenne un cerveau plus volumineux,
et la taille du cerveau est corrélée au QI.
C’est marqué noir sur blanc et il n’y a pas que cette étude
C’est un faux sujet
Les hommes ont en moyenne un cerveau plus volumineux,
et la taille du cerveau est corrélée au QI.
C’est marqué noir sur blanc et il n’y a pas que cette étude
C’est un faux sujet
Rien de bancal, il dit.
alors qu'ils disent bien que ce sont des théories isolées et que c'est presque impossible à mesurer
Ici le sujet est Femme a une intelligence même à celle de l'homme dans la norme.
"Three methods for quantifying sex differences in intelligence among adults have now been
considered. These consist of adopting (1) the Full Scale IQ of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale,
for which six studies give a mean male advantage of 3.1 IQ points; (2) the Burt-Vernon model of
the group verbal and spatial factors which give a male advantage of 4.6 IQ points; and (3) the
Cattell-Gustafsson model which adds reasoning abilities to the Burt-Vernon verbal and spatial
abilities, and which gives a male advantage of 3.8 IQ points. There is not a great deal of difference
between the three estimates. To derive the best single figure I would begin by discarding the Wechsler
Full Scale IQs on the grounds that these are simply the average of an arbitrary collection of tests with
little theoretical rationale. As between the Burt-Vernon and the Cattell-Gustafsson models, the
Cattell-Gustafsson is probably to be preferred on the grounds that it includes the important reasoning
abilities, which are central to the construct of intelligence. It is therefore proposed to adopt the 3.8
IQ point differential obtained from the Cattell-Gustafsson model and round it up to 4 IQ points as
the best estimate of the sex difference in intelligence among adults.
We need to consider now the magnitude of the male advantage for intelligence that would be
expected from the larger male brain. This can be estimated as follows. The male-female difference
in brain size adjusted for body size is calculated by Ankney (1992) at approx. 100 g and the pooled
standard deviation for brain size is 128 g. Hence males have a brain size advantage of 0.78 standard
deviation units. The correlation between brain size measured by magnetic resonance imaging and
intelligence has been calculated by Willerman et aE.(199 1) at 0.35. The male advantage for intelligence
accruing from greater brain size is therefore 0.78 X 0.35 = 0.27 standard deviation units = 4 IQ points.
Thus the theoretical magnitude of the male advantage in intelligence arising from the larger male brain
gives a close fit to the data."
4 points d'IQ de différence vérifée il dit
Tu as des recherches plus récentes qui disent qu'il y a approx 4 IQ de plus chez l'homme ?
Ici le sujet est Femme a une intelligence même à celle de l'homme dans la norme.
"Three methods for quantifying sex differences in intelligence among adults have now been
considered. These consist of adopting (1) the Full Scale IQ of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale,
for which six studies give a mean male advantage of 3.1 IQ points; (2) the Burt-Vernon model of
the group verbal and spatial factors which give a male advantage of 4.6 IQ points; and (3) the
Cattell-Gustafsson model which adds reasoning abilities to the Burt-Vernon verbal and spatial
abilities, and which gives a male advantage of 3.8 IQ points. There is not a great deal of difference
between the three estimates. To derive the best single figure I would begin by discarding the Wechsler
Full Scale IQs on the grounds that these are simply the average of an arbitrary collection of tests with
little theoretical rationale. As between the Burt-Vernon and the Cattell-Gustafsson models, the
Cattell-Gustafsson is probably to be preferred on the grounds that it includes the important reasoning
abilities, which are central to the construct of intelligence. It is therefore proposed to adopt the 3.8
IQ point differential obtained from the Cattell-Gustafsson model and round it up to 4 IQ points as
the best estimate of the sex difference in intelligence among adults.
We need to consider now the magnitude of the male advantage for intelligence that would be
expected from the larger male brain. This can be estimated as follows. The male-female difference
in brain size adjusted for body size is calculated by Ankney (1992) at approx. 100 g and the pooled
standard deviation for brain size is 128 g. Hence males have a brain size advantage of 0.78 standard
deviation units. The correlation between brain size measured by magnetic resonance imaging and
intelligence has been calculated by Willerman et aE.(199 1) at 0.35. The male advantage for intelligence
accruing from greater brain size is therefore 0.78 X 0.35 = 0.27 standard deviation units = 4 IQ points.
Thus the theoretical magnitude of the male advantage in intelligence arising from the larger male brain
gives a close fit to the data."
4 points d'IQ de différence vérifée il dit
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Rien de bancal, il dit.
alors qu'ils disent bien que ce sont des théories isolées et que c'est presque impossible à mesurer
Ici le sujet est Femme a une intelligence même à celle de l'homme dans la norme.
"Three methods for quantifying sex differences in intelligence among adults have now been
considered. These consist of adopting (1) the Full Scale IQ of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale,
for which six studies give a mean male advantage of 3.1 IQ points; (2) the Burt-Vernon model of
the group verbal and spatial factors which give a male advantage of 4.6 IQ points; and (3) the
Cattell-Gustafsson model which adds reasoning abilities to the Burt-Vernon verbal and spatial
abilities, and which gives a male advantage of 3.8 IQ points. There is not a great deal of difference
between the three estimates. To derive the best single figure I would begin by discarding the Wechsler
Full Scale IQs on the grounds that these are simply the average of an arbitrary collection of tests with
little theoretical rationale. As between the Burt-Vernon and the Cattell-Gustafsson models, the
Cattell-Gustafsson is probably to be preferred on the grounds that it includes the important reasoning
abilities, which are central to the construct of intelligence. It is therefore proposed to adopt the 3.8
IQ point differential obtained from the Cattell-Gustafsson model and round it up to 4 IQ points as
the best estimate of the sex difference in intelligence among adults.
We need to consider now the magnitude of the male advantage for intelligence that would be
expected from the larger male brain. This can be estimated as follows. The male-female difference
in brain size adjusted for body size is calculated by Ankney (1992) at approx. 100 g and the pooled
standard deviation for brain size is 128 g. Hence males have a brain size advantage of 0.78 standard
deviation units. The correlation between brain size measured by magnetic resonance imaging and
intelligence has been calculated by Willerman et aE.(199 1) at 0.35. The male advantage for intelligence
accruing from greater brain size is therefore 0.78 X 0.35 = 0.27 standard deviation units = 4 IQ points.
Thus the theoretical magnitude of the male advantage in intelligence arising from the larger male brain
gives a close fit to the data."
4 points d'IQ de différence vérifée il dit
Tu as des recherches plus récentes qui disent qu'il y a approx 4 IQ de plus chez l'homme ?
Ici le sujet est Femme a une intelligence même à celle de l'homme dans la norme.
"Three methods for quantifying sex differences in intelligence among adults have now been
considered. These consist of adopting (1) the Full Scale IQ of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale,
for which six studies give a mean male advantage of 3.1 IQ points; (2) the Burt-Vernon model of
the group verbal and spatial factors which give a male advantage of 4.6 IQ points; and (3) the
Cattell-Gustafsson model which adds reasoning abilities to the Burt-Vernon verbal and spatial
abilities, and which gives a male advantage of 3.8 IQ points. There is not a great deal of difference
between the three estimates. To derive the best single figure I would begin by discarding the Wechsler
Full Scale IQs on the grounds that these are simply the average of an arbitrary collection of tests with
little theoretical rationale. As between the Burt-Vernon and the Cattell-Gustafsson models, the
Cattell-Gustafsson is probably to be preferred on the grounds that it includes the important reasoning
abilities, which are central to the construct of intelligence. It is therefore proposed to adopt the 3.8
IQ point differential obtained from the Cattell-Gustafsson model and round it up to 4 IQ points as
the best estimate of the sex difference in intelligence among adults.
We need to consider now the magnitude of the male advantage for intelligence that would be
expected from the larger male brain. This can be estimated as follows. The male-female difference
in brain size adjusted for body size is calculated by Ankney (1992) at approx. 100 g and the pooled
standard deviation for brain size is 128 g. Hence males have a brain size advantage of 0.78 standard
deviation units. The correlation between brain size measured by magnetic resonance imaging and
intelligence has been calculated by Willerman et aE.(199 1) at 0.35. The male advantage for intelligence
accruing from greater brain size is therefore 0.78 X 0.35 = 0.27 standard deviation units = 4 IQ points.
Thus the theoretical magnitude of the male advantage in intelligence arising from the larger male brain
gives a close fit to the data."
4 points d'IQ de différence vérifée il dit
Oui j’en ai
Mais pourquoi je devrais te les donner ?
Tu fais une affirmation sans aucune source, et tu te contentes de dire que les études ne sont pas valables quand ça va pas dans ton sens
Tu ne cites aucun domaine où les femmes dominent les hommes et qui caractérise l’intelligence
La discussion n’a pas d’intérêt
Mais pourquoi je devrais te les donner ?
Tu fais une affirmation sans aucune source, et tu te contentes de dire que les études ne sont pas valables quand ça va pas dans ton sens
Tu ne cites aucun domaine où les femmes dominent les hommes et qui caractérise l’intelligence
La discussion n’a pas d’intérêt
Oui j’en ai
Mais pourquoi je devrais te les donner ?
Tu fais une affirmation sans aucune source, et tu te contentes de dire que les études ne sont pas valables quand ça va pas dans ton sens
Tu ne cites aucun domaine où les femmes dominent les hommes et qui caractérise l’intelligence
La discussion n’a pas d’intérêt
Mais pourquoi je devrais te les donner ?
Tu fais une affirmation sans aucune source, et tu te contentes de dire que les études ne sont pas valables quand ça va pas dans ton sens
Tu ne cites aucun domaine où les femmes dominent les hommes et qui caractérise l’intelligence
La discussion n’a pas d’intérêt
Alors je considère que tu n'en as pas. Bonne fin de soirée, l'ami
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Jusqu'ici, personne n'a su contrer le titre
je suis fan des pass sanitaires
Pour les olympiades de mathématiques, d’info, la recherche, les médailles, les prix Nobel ce que vous voulez les hommes dominent
Même les sujets plus abstraits comme l’art, la littérature, le cinéma
Trouvez juste un domaine qui caractérise l’intelligence ou les femmes dominent objectivement les hommes
Même les sujets plus abstraits comme l’art, la littérature, le cinéma
Trouvez juste un domaine qui caractérise l’intelligence ou les femmes dominent objectivement les hommes
Perso j'avoue je sèche pour trouver ce genre de compétition intellectuelle où les podiums sont monopolisés par des femmes
Je suis le donut du forum
