Ce sujet a été résolu
Dans les explications ils expliquent que les Français ont besoin de règles / lois / réglementation etc… ils veulent pas nécessairement s’y plier et les respecter, mais ont besoin quand même qu’il y ai un cadre.
Oui mais un bon cadre
il y a 2 ans
Vas y je vais y aller en revenant d'Espagne :Ronaldo4:
Comment ça se fait que t'es sur le forum alors que t'es sensé t'amuser et profiter de tes vacances ? :Ronaldo4:
il y a 2 ans
Comment ça se fait que t'es sur le forum alors que t'es sensé t'amuser et profiter de tes vacances ? :Ronaldo4:
Je vais manger et cet après midi je vais aller visiter un village :Ronaldo4:
il y a 2 ans
Oui mais un bon cadre
On est un peuple plutôt carré en fait. C’est rigolo.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
On est un peuple plutôt carré en fait. C’est rigolo.
Non c'est l'état qui veut plus nous contrôler plus centralisé que dans d'autres pays
il y a 2 ans
On est un peuple plutôt carré en fait. C’est rigolo.
Tu veux dire que les PEUPLES ne sont pas ÉGAUX et ont des DIFFÉRENCES?
Gardez mémoire de moi, non point tel que j’ai failli, mais tel que j’étais car même après 4 mois je reste le KING
il y a 2 ans
Mais tu racontes quoi sale low qi el famoso marche de l'emploi qui protège avec toutes les loi de Macron putain
il y a 2 ans
Non c'est l'état qui veut plus nous contrôler plus centralisé que dans d'autres pays
En gros ça explique que les Français veulent un leader fort en cas de crises (type Covid), mais beaucoup plus faible dans les périodes de calme.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
En gros ça explique que les Français veulent un leader fort en cas de crises (type Covid), mais beaucoup plus faible dans les périodes de calme.
Oui c'est de la connerie la rhétorique des puissants pour nous contrôler d'avantage
Pendant le covid les gens ont gueule justement c'était trop de contrôle
Pendant le covid les gens ont gueule justement c'était trop de contrôle
il y a 2 ans
Tu veux dire que les PEUPLES ne sont pas ÉGAUX et ont des DIFFÉRENCES?
Non mais justement c’est intéressant de voir ces différences et d’identifier les root-causes.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
Non mais justement c’est intéressant de voir ces différences et d’identifier les root-causes.
Intéressant oui
Gardez mémoire de moi, non point tel que j’ai failli, mais tel que j’étais car même après 4 mois je reste le KING
il y a 2 ans
Intéressant oui
Il y a pas de notion de bien ou moins bien, c’est pas des jugements de valeurs.
Juste comprendre par quoi se traduit les cultures.
Juste comprendre par quoi se traduit les cultures.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
Non mais justement c’est intéressant de voir ces différences et d’identifier les root-causes.
Les root cause c'est l'histoire de la centralisation de l'état français par rapport à d'autres pays en Espagne c'est pas du tout comme ça
il y a 2 ans
Il y a pas de notion de bien ou moins bien, c’est pas des jugements de valeurs.
Juste comprendre par quoi se traduit les cultures.
Juste comprendre par quoi se traduit les cultures.
J’ai jamais parlé de notion de bien ou moins bien
Pourquoi t’amènes d’instinct le jugement de valeurs?
Pourquoi t’amènes d’instinct le jugement de valeurs?
Gardez mémoire de moi, non point tel que j’ai failli, mais tel que j’étais car même après 4 mois je reste le KING
il y a 2 ans
J’ai jamais parlé de notion de bien ou moins bien
Pourquoi t’amènes d’instinct le jugement de valeurs?
Pourquoi t’amènes d’instinct le jugement de valeurs?
Trop de centralisation c'est mal
il y a 2 ans
Les root cause c'est l'histoire de la centralisation de l'état français par rapport à d'autres pays en Espagne c'est pas du tout comme ça
C’est l’une des explications.
Concernant le Power Distance ça serait aussi lié à une très longue histoire de monarchie ABSOLUE.
Concernant le Power Distance ça serait aussi lié à une très longue histoire de monarchie ABSOLUE.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
AHI
The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether people's self-image is defined in terms of "I" or "We". In Individualist societies people are supposed to look after themselves and their direct family only. In Collectivist societies people belong to 'in groups' that take care of them in exchange for loyalty.
France, with a score of 74, is shown to be an individualist society. Parents make their children emotionally independent about the groups to which they belong. This means that one is only supposed to take care of oneself and one’s family.
The French combination of a high score on Power Distance and a high score on Individualism is rather unique. We only find the same combination in Belgium and, to some degree, in Spain and northern Italy.
This combination is not unique, but it also creates a contradiction, so to speak. Only so to speak, because scores in the model don’t influence anything. They just give a structured reflection of reality. This combination manifests itself in France in the following ways:
It is claimed that one reason why the French are less obese than people in other EU countries is that parents still have more sway over children than in other EU countries. Whether this is true or not is not known by us. All the same, what is true is that the family has still more emotional glue than in other Individualist cultures. This is a reflection of the high score on Power Distance with its stronger respect for the elderly. Subordinates normally pay formal respect and show deference to their boss, but behind his/her back they may do the opposite of what they promised to do, as they may think that they know better, yet are not able to express so. Another reflection of high Power Distance contrary to formal obedience is the total rejection of those in power as there is no way to change by evolution but only by strikes, revolts, and revolution. Employers and trade unions don’t talk together as they look at each other as almost belonging to a separate species. The need to make a strong distinction between work and private life is even stronger in France than in the US, even though the US scores higher on Individualism. This is a reflection of the fact that employees more quickly feel put under pressure than in the US because of their emotional dependence on what the boss says and does. In cultures that score high on Power Distance and Collectivism, the “normal” combination, such dependence is welcomed. At least, if the power holders act as benevolent fathers. The French prefer to be dependent on the central government, an impersonal power center that cannot so easily invade their private life. What is human, but more pronounced in France, is the need for strong leadership in times of crisis. Despite that, when the crisis is resolved the president should make space for much weaker leadership. Many French need to become a “patron”, whether as mayor of a small village or as the chairman of the bridge club. Customer service is poor in the eyes of all those Anglo-Saxons who believe that the customer is king. Not so in France. The French are self-motivated to be the best in their trade. They, therefore, expect respect for what they do, after which they are very much willing to serve you well.
The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether people's self-image is defined in terms of "I" or "We". In Individualist societies people are supposed to look after themselves and their direct family only. In Collectivist societies people belong to 'in groups' that take care of them in exchange for loyalty.
France, with a score of 74, is shown to be an individualist society. Parents make their children emotionally independent about the groups to which they belong. This means that one is only supposed to take care of oneself and one’s family.
The French combination of a high score on Power Distance and a high score on Individualism is rather unique. We only find the same combination in Belgium and, to some degree, in Spain and northern Italy.
This combination is not unique, but it also creates a contradiction, so to speak. Only so to speak, because scores in the model don’t influence anything. They just give a structured reflection of reality. This combination manifests itself in France in the following ways:
It is claimed that one reason why the French are less obese than people in other EU countries is that parents still have more sway over children than in other EU countries. Whether this is true or not is not known by us. All the same, what is true is that the family has still more emotional glue than in other Individualist cultures. This is a reflection of the high score on Power Distance with its stronger respect for the elderly. Subordinates normally pay formal respect and show deference to their boss, but behind his/her back they may do the opposite of what they promised to do, as they may think that they know better, yet are not able to express so. Another reflection of high Power Distance contrary to formal obedience is the total rejection of those in power as there is no way to change by evolution but only by strikes, revolts, and revolution. Employers and trade unions don’t talk together as they look at each other as almost belonging to a separate species. The need to make a strong distinction between work and private life is even stronger in France than in the US, even though the US scores higher on Individualism. This is a reflection of the fact that employees more quickly feel put under pressure than in the US because of their emotional dependence on what the boss says and does. In cultures that score high on Power Distance and Collectivism, the “normal” combination, such dependence is welcomed. At least, if the power holders act as benevolent fathers. The French prefer to be dependent on the central government, an impersonal power center that cannot so easily invade their private life. What is human, but more pronounced in France, is the need for strong leadership in times of crisis. Despite that, when the crisis is resolved the president should make space for much weaker leadership. Many French need to become a “patron”, whether as mayor of a small village or as the chairman of the bridge club. Customer service is poor in the eyes of all those Anglo-Saxons who believe that the customer is king. Not so in France. The French are self-motivated to be the best in their trade. They, therefore, expect respect for what they do, after which they are very much willing to serve you well.
🧐🧐🧐
il y a 2 ans
AHI
The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether people's self-image is defined in terms of "I" or "We". In Individualist societies people are supposed to look after themselves and their direct family only. In Collectivist societies people belong to 'in groups' that take care of them in exchange for loyalty.
France, with a score of 74, is shown to be an individualist society. Parents make their children emotionally independent about the groups to which they belong. This means that one is only supposed to take care of oneself and one’s family.
The French combination of a high score on Power Distance and a high score on Individualism is rather unique. We only find the same combination in Belgium and, to some degree, in Spain and northern Italy.
This combination is not unique, but it also creates a contradiction, so to speak. Only so to speak, because scores in the model don’t influence anything. They just give a structured reflection of reality. This combination manifests itself in France in the following ways:
It is claimed that one reason why the French are less obese than people in other EU countries is that parents still have more sway over children than in other EU countries. Whether this is true or not is not known by us. All the same, what is true is that the family has still more emotional glue than in other Individualist cultures. This is a reflection of the high score on Power Distance with its stronger respect for the elderly. Subordinates normally pay formal respect and show deference to their boss, but behind his/her back they may do the opposite of what they promised to do, as they may think that they know better, yet are not able to express so. Another reflection of high Power Distance contrary to formal obedience is the total rejection of those in power as there is no way to change by evolution but only by strikes, revolts, and revolution. Employers and trade unions don’t talk together as they look at each other as almost belonging to a separate species. The need to make a strong distinction between work and private life is even stronger in France than in the US, even though the US scores higher on Individualism. This is a reflection of the fact that employees more quickly feel put under pressure than in the US because of their emotional dependence on what the boss says and does. In cultures that score high on Power Distance and Collectivism, the “normal” combination, such dependence is welcomed. At least, if the power holders act as benevolent fathers. The French prefer to be dependent on the central government, an impersonal power center that cannot so easily invade their private life. What is human, but more pronounced in France, is the need for strong leadership in times of crisis. Despite that, when the crisis is resolved the president should make space for much weaker leadership. Many French need to become a “patron”, whether as mayor of a small village or as the chairman of the bridge club. Customer service is poor in the eyes of all those Anglo-Saxons who believe that the customer is king. Not so in France. The French are self-motivated to be the best in their trade. They, therefore, expect respect for what they do, after which they are very much willing to serve you well.
The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. It has to do with whether people's self-image is defined in terms of "I" or "We". In Individualist societies people are supposed to look after themselves and their direct family only. In Collectivist societies people belong to 'in groups' that take care of them in exchange for loyalty.
France, with a score of 74, is shown to be an individualist society. Parents make their children emotionally independent about the groups to which they belong. This means that one is only supposed to take care of oneself and one’s family.
The French combination of a high score on Power Distance and a high score on Individualism is rather unique. We only find the same combination in Belgium and, to some degree, in Spain and northern Italy.
This combination is not unique, but it also creates a contradiction, so to speak. Only so to speak, because scores in the model don’t influence anything. They just give a structured reflection of reality. This combination manifests itself in France in the following ways:
It is claimed that one reason why the French are less obese than people in other EU countries is that parents still have more sway over children than in other EU countries. Whether this is true or not is not known by us. All the same, what is true is that the family has still more emotional glue than in other Individualist cultures. This is a reflection of the high score on Power Distance with its stronger respect for the elderly. Subordinates normally pay formal respect and show deference to their boss, but behind his/her back they may do the opposite of what they promised to do, as they may think that they know better, yet are not able to express so. Another reflection of high Power Distance contrary to formal obedience is the total rejection of those in power as there is no way to change by evolution but only by strikes, revolts, and revolution. Employers and trade unions don’t talk together as they look at each other as almost belonging to a separate species. The need to make a strong distinction between work and private life is even stronger in France than in the US, even though the US scores higher on Individualism. This is a reflection of the fact that employees more quickly feel put under pressure than in the US because of their emotional dependence on what the boss says and does. In cultures that score high on Power Distance and Collectivism, the “normal” combination, such dependence is welcomed. At least, if the power holders act as benevolent fathers. The French prefer to be dependent on the central government, an impersonal power center that cannot so easily invade their private life. What is human, but more pronounced in France, is the need for strong leadership in times of crisis. Despite that, when the crisis is resolved the president should make space for much weaker leadership. Many French need to become a “patron”, whether as mayor of a small village or as the chairman of the bridge club. Customer service is poor in the eyes of all those Anglo-Saxons who believe that the customer is king. Not so in France. The French are self-motivated to be the best in their trade. They, therefore, expect respect for what they do, after which they are very much willing to serve you well.
even though the US scores higher on Individualism
il y a 2 ans

















