PAVES GEANTS ANTI GIEC : L'offensive géante contre la propagande de Davos et du GIEC sur le CLIMAT!

L'étude dans son format pdf : file:///C:/Users/33601/Downloads/Piao_et_al_2019_NREE.pdf








Publié sur ads également : https://ui.adsabs.harvard[...]9NRvEE...1...14P/abstract

ainsi que dans Semantic Scholar : https://www.semanticschol[...]4ed5ca15d2d9bb3658fc9b6f0

Une autre étude sur le sujet : Response of vegetation cover to CO2 and climate changes between Last Glacial Maximum and pre-industrial period in a dynamic global vegetation model


Elle a été publié sur ResearchGate également : https://www.researchgate.[...]c_global_vegetation_model

Publiée par Chen, Weizhe ; Zhu, Dan ; Ciais, Philippe ; Huang, Chunju ; Viovy, Nicolas ; Kageyama, Masa






Publiée dans ADS également : https://ui.adsabs.harvard[...]9QSRv..218..293C/abstract


Ainsi que dans ScienceDirect : https://www.sciencedirect[...]abs/pii/S0277379119301945

L'étude en question date de 2019.

Il fut un temps où les animaux vivaient dans des chauds plus chaudes qu'aujourd'hui.

Et ces eaux étaient de près de 20 degrés plus chaudes.

Et la conséquence de cela était un accroissement clair et net du niveau de CO2.

De l'ordre d'entre 5 et 10 fois plus qu'aujourd'hui.

Entre 2000 et 4000 ppm.

Source : https://saltbushclub.com/[...]021/05/co2-starvation.jpg

Pour continuer sur l'arnaque du GIEC, il faut savoir que qu'il y a une étude qui a été effectué en 2023 comparant les données de température RSS avec celles d'UAH pour la période allant précisément de 1979 à 2021.

Et il se trouve que depuis plus de 4 décennies, l'atmosphère s'est réchauffée à seulement la moitié du taux qui avait été prédit par les modèles du GIEC.

Source : https://agupubs.onlinelib[...]full/10.1029/2022JD037472

Publié dans Advancing Earth and Space Science.

Publiée par Cheng-Zhi Zou, Hui Xu, Xianjun Hao, Qian Liu

tu as trop de temps libre khey, néanmoins je soutien l'effort

Professeur . Ian Pilmer, géologue australien 140 articles scientifiques, 12 livres + prix scientifiques :

“Even if this could be demonstrated, it would have to demonstrate that the ~97% of natural CO2 emissions are not the cause.
“I have no opinions. I have demonstrable facts. These facts are validated and reproducible. Fact No. 1: No one has ever proven that human CO2 emissions are the cause of global warming. It was NEVER demonstrated. It's been a fraud since day 1
“We never hear about the main greenhouse gas, water vapor. It is water vapor, water, clouds whatever their form which are the regulators of the atmosphere of our planet. It is not a trace gas (CO2).
“If someone said, ‘Oh, it’s the hottest day on record,’ you have to ask them, since when? If this is the hottest day in the last 120,000 years, then it's a record. But, currently it is cooler than 4,000 years ago”
“We oppose those who lie, those who defraud and traffic in history (and data). We must fight with facts. And we have to fight much harder than we ever thought. It is not the climate that is threatened.
“It’s a crisis of government policy, it’s a crisis of education. So we have a problem with terms like climate crisis, extinction, emergency or transition. This whole thing is ridiculous.

Je sacrifie mes nuits là limite. C'est même pas du temps libre techniquement.

https://www.lavoisier.com[...]ge/climategate-emails.pdf



Il faudrait que j'évoque le climategate et les emails également.

Au cas où le lien disparaitrait.

This booklet is dedicated to the memory of John Daly, Australia’s pioneer global
warming skeptic. John’s first publication about global warming, The Greenhouse
Trap, was published by Bantam Books in 1989. It has stood the test of time ex-
tremely well.
John was a pioneer in the use of the Web to disseminate information that was
relevant to this important debate and his website, ‘Still Waiting for Greenhouse’,
showed the power which the Web afforded to those who were shut out of the main-
stream media, but who had important information to make available to all who were
involved in this historic debate.
His sudden, untimely death in January 2004, at the age of 61, was a great loss to the
skeptics’ cause, and tributes to him flowed in from all over the world. An obituary
can be found on the Lavoisier Group website.

The Climategate emails expose to our view a world that was previously hidden from
virtually everyone.
This formerly hidden world was made up of a very few players. But they controlled
those critical Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) processes involv-
ing the temperature records from the past, and the official interpretation of cur-
rent temperature data. They exerted previously unrecognized influence on the “peer
review” process for papers seeking publication in the officially recognised climate
science literature from which the IPCC was supposed to rely exclusively in order to
draw its conclusions.
The Climategate emails demonstrate that these people had no regard for the tradi-
tions and assumptions which had developed over centuries and which provided the
foundations of Western science. At the very core of this tradition is respect for truth
and honesty in reporting data and results; and a recognition that all the data, and all
the steps required to reach a result, had to be available to the scientific world at large.
There are two issues which now have to be addressed. The first is the damage which
has been done to the standing of science as an intellectual discipline on which our
civilisation depends. The second is the status of the IPCC, since that institution is
the source of scientific authority on which prime ministers and other political lead-
ers rely to legitimise their statements about global warming.
The IPCC was established by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and
the United Nations Environment Panel (UNEP) in 1988. From the very beginning
its brief was to report on mankind’s influence on climate change.
The IPCC has published four assessment reports, in 1991, 1996, 2001, and in 2007.
Every successive report has upped the ante, both in the confidence of their predic-
tions of increasing global temperatures and rising sea-levels, and in the surety that
mankind is responsible for continued warming.
The Climategate emails originate from the University of East Anglia’s, Climatic Re-
search Unit, (CRU) founded by climatology pioneer Hubert Lamb. Tom Wigley,
who was born and educated in Adelaide, was Director of the CRU until 1993 and
was succeeded by Phil Jones, who is one of two lead players in this story.
The other lead player is Mike Mann, from Penn State University. Mike Mann leapt
from relative obscurity to international fame with his “hockey stick”, a graph of
global temperatures from 1000 AD to the present, which was the showpiece at theiv
launching of the 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report in Shanghai in January 2001.
The hockey stick became a corporate logo for the IPCC , but because it rubbed out
the Mediaeval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age from the historical record, it was
subjected to a US congressional inquiry. Eventually it was shown that random data
fed into the algorithms used by Mann to produce his hockey stick from bristle cone
pine tree ring data, also yielded hockey stick results.
In this annotated edition of the Climategate emails, John Costella shows us how a
very small cabal of climate scientists, based at the University of East Anglia and at
Penn State University, were able to control the temperature record fed into the IPCC
reports and which comprised the foundation on which the whole global warming
structure was based. The only data base which they could not influence was the
satellite measured temperature data which John Christy and Roy Spencer, from the
University of Alabama, had established from 1979 on.
That this was a real conspiracy is beyond argument. The word “conspiracy” is used
by the players themselves. In any conspiracy there is a tight inner core and then suc-
cessive rings of collaborators, who accept the leadership of the central core.
The hero who emerges from these emails is Steve McIntyre, a Canadian ex-geologist
and mining analyst, who with remarkable patience and courtesy kept on asking for
the data and the computer programmes upon which the various IPCC pronounce-
ments were based. He has performed a great service for the world, which one day
will surely be recognised.
The other hero, so far unknown, is the whistle-blower who realised the implications
of what was going on and was able to place all these emails on an obscure Russian
website.
John Costella has done a great service in making these emails intelligible to us all.
The Lavoisier Group is grateful to him for allowing us to publish his work. The cost
of this publication was met through donations from the Lavoisier Group’s member
and friends and on behalf of the Board I thank them for their generous support.
Hugh Morgan
Melbourne
March 2010

Phil Jones (IPCC)

“All the work we have done… must be well hidden. I have discussed this with the funder (US Dep of Energy)…they are happy not to publish the original station data.”