Un post = un missile sur l'Algérie

un post = 100 000 algériens qui sont téléporté en France et reçoivent immédiatement la nationalité française + une rente de 1000 euros chacuns à vie versé par la France

Le Phoenix renait toujours de son 410 !

il y a 2 mois

TurboLover

Je te ferais nettoyer mes bottes avec ta langue avant de t'écraser les couilles avec

il y a 2 mois

JVCucks

raas klaat

il y a 2 mois

Juiffondor

je ne suis pas la pour provoquer le lancement d'un nouveau missile, mais pour condamner fermement

il y a 2 mois

PlayStation

POST 🦅🦅🦅🦅 UN PEU DE DÉMOCRATIE

il y a 2 mois

ADL

Pq en Algérie pupuce

Pq pas en Israël

Je peux CUM sur ta gueule ?

il y a 2 mois

Anthony_A3

Je condamne fermement.

The Duce Myth: Why Mussolini Was Not A Good Leader

When we discuss dictators today regardless of their political beliefs our conversations often revolve around their iron fisted rule their harsh suppression of descent their disregard for freedom of speech and the countries they invaded among other things. We mostly like to focus on those things first and foremost although these facets of their governance are undeniably significant there's another aspect of the rule that often gets overlooked their actual administrative policies. Beyond silencing opposition and wielding total power it's worth considering whether they effectively manage to govern their countries for instance did they create more employment opportunities, enhance the economy or introduce essential reforms. When discussing Bonito musolini and his fascist regime the mainstream conversation tends to emphasize this authoritarian rule and expansionist policy but rarely delves into the specifics. Some view him as a relatively effective leader. Many modern fascists idealize Mussolini's era in Italy portraying it as a time of prosperity. they highlight the introduction of welfare and pensions musolini providing homes for Italians his defense of justice and his efforts to boost the economy among other achievements. We must examine several aspects of Mussolini's Italy : the welfare system, the draining the marches, the approach to law and justice, the economy under fascism, Mussolini's statemanship and the notion of Mussolini being a sort of humanitarian dictator.If you want to learn more about fascist Italy, I recommend you the book : " Mussolini also did a lot of good. " from Francesco Filippi.

One of the most prevalent beliefs about musolini and the fascist today is their supposed establishment of the Italian welfare system including old age pensions through a modern Social Security framework. Moreover it's claimed that the fascist regime introduced various other wellfare initiatives such as granting workers additional holiday pay, thus the fascist allegedly gave Italians workplace security and the right to old age pensions or did they? In reality, Mussolini was not the one who introduced old age pensions in Italy. It was actually the government of Francesco Crispi that first adopted a guaranteed pension system in the country back in 1895 via Royal Decree n 70 on February 21st of 1895. It provided public sector workers and servicemen provided with social secutiry protection upon reaching the retirement age. Following that, under the government of Luigi Pelloux, the system was broadened with law number 350 extending insurance coverage to a range of professional workers. Initially this system was voluntary and included State incentives for companies that participated. However due to the persistent efforts of Italian trade unions it quickly expanded to encompass many of the country's Key Blue Collar professions. The fascist seized power they swiftly took control of the social security system by 1923. The Senior Management of the National Insurance Fund was replaced with melini's cronies and representatives from fascist trade unions. Mussolini's main goal was to politicize the welfare system and bring it under the control of his party. He sought to consolidate all forms of Social Security into a single entity. The fascist National Insurance Institute e was a propagandistic move to claim ownership over an existing system. Mussolini didn't create the welfare system he simply co-opted it. The situation became problematic as Beyond serving as a propaganda tool to suggest the fascist had established a new welfare system.

The politicization of the infps meant benefits were skewed towards certain individuals specifically those in positions of favor with the fascist party. They actually scaled back welfare offering invalidity and old age coverage only to certain professional categories as it assumed control over an increasingly large portion of insurance schemes. Iit wasn't until the fall of fascism that the fund was depoliticized and the Italian government passed law number 153. This law among other Provisions offered economic support to everyone age 65 and over regardless of their political affiliation or whether they had made contributions to the system. As for additional benefits for workers such as the extra holiday pay, there's a common belief that Mussloini as instrumental in establishing the Tredicesima ( year end bonus ) or the year and bonus for employees benefiting millions of Italians annually. However a closer examination of fascist legislation reveals that this claim is not only overstated but also incorrect. The so-called 13th monthly wage also known as the Christmas bonus was indeed mentioned in Article 13 of the national Collective labor agreement for employees but this legislation did not grant its benefit to all workers. Instead as you might have guessed it was primarily white collar workers affiliated with the party who received this bonus Factory. Workers despite promises were left without this extra pay. If anything the agreement actually made it worse for the workers by tightening up overtime work.

According to article 8 of the agreement : " For personnel with this continuous duties the working hours will normally envisage a maximum of 10 hours a day. The number of of hours may be increased to 12 a day for certain duties if expressly determined in supplementary agreements. Within the limits allowed by the law no clerical worker May refuse to perform overtime night and holiday work borrowing Justified reasons of impediment. " Source : National Collective Labor Agreement in " Gazetta Ufficiale no 199 27/8/1937. The imposition of extended working hours 10 to 12 hours a day instead of the standard 8 was a strategy to tether workers rights closely to the demands of the industry effectively curbing their freedoms. The broad extension of benefits including the year end bonus of the majority of factory workers both unskilled and skilled did not occur until after the war. It was in late 1946 that the Italian government expanded this benefit to all Factory workers without distinction by a decree from the president. In 1960 the protocol for workers pay was further extended to all workers establishing it as an official right. The fascists did not create the welfare system, they co-opted and politicized an existing one to benefit only those associated with a fascist party. The fascist approach to Social Security served two main purposes, firstly to strengthen the party's grip on social sectors by adapting social welfare to be more easily controlled and secondly to transform the state's extensive administrative machinery into an instrument of fascism. For all intents and purposes Mussolini did not advocate for the welfare of all Italians but strictly used it as a tool of his party to extend control and only benefit the members of it.

As for the draining of marshes myth. Italians have certainly heard this one before that under Mussolini's regime, there was an ambitious project to drain numerous marshlands across Italy to make the lands available for Italian Farmers to settle and cultivate. The concept of draining marshlands didn't originate with Mussolini ni nor was he the pionner. In unified Italy to embark on such Endeavors the idea of a systematic reclamation dates back to the 15th century initiated by the papacy and the first comprehensive legislation aimed at marshland reclamation was enacted in 1878 by the unified Kingdom of Italy. A deeper dive into the legislative efforts of that era reveals a significant focus on marshlands reclamation well before Mussolini rises into power. Specifically in the year 1922 just before the march on Rome, approximately 20 Royal decrees were issued to intensify state-backed Reclamation projects. Some will argue back saying that it might not have been his idea but that was
he who managed to reclaim the marshes. We need to analyze whether fascist measures for land reclamation were more effective than those of the previous governments. Upon initiating their reclamation projects the fascist government encountered a familiar obstacle that had also challenged previous regimes. The marshlands were owned by numerous individuals who were reluctant to relinquish their property without compensation. This resistance led to the suspension of several of Mussolini's ambitious reclamation plans and resulted in the resignation of Arrigo Serpieri, who was the economist responsible for crafting their relevant legislation from the outset. The fascists didn't meet more success than previous governments. In an effort to overcome these hurdles the fascist government sought investment from the private sector but the industrialists lacked confidence in Mussolini's committment to the reclamation's efforts.

il y a un mois

Un dernier pour la route

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Se connecter pour participer

Forums

Blabla Général Autonomie & Lifehack Jeux vidéo Finance & Crypto Le Vidéoclub 🍿Tous les forums

En ligne

257

Sur ce sujet0

Devenez donateur !

Faire un don en Crypto