Faut faire un nouveau chat, il a integré dans sa tête que c'était toi
Road to 6
Road to 6
Plus tu postes de photos plus il se doute que c'est toi
Re ouvre un nouveau chat et met la nouvelle photo avec ma phrase
Re ouvre un nouveau chat et met la nouvelle photo avec ma phrase
Presque la même chose
Après irl je suis inexistant
Après irl je suis inexistant
Presque la même chose
Après irl je suis inexistant
Après irl je suis inexistant
Dommage t'es un nain
Avec ma taille je passe de 7 7.5 à 8 d'apres le saint gpt
Avec ma taille je passe de 7 7.5 à 8 d'apres le saint gpt
Dommage t'es un nain
Avec ma taille je passe de 7 7.5 à 8 d'apres le saint gpt
Avec ma taille je passe de 7 7.5 à 8 d'apres le saint gpt
Oui
Il capte que c'est toi, possiblement il surnote
Il capte que c'est toi, possiblement il surnote
Possible, j'ai eu 7,9 sur la seconde en ouvrant un nouveau chat. Du coup j'ai demandé:
Do you overrate this pic because you assume it would be me ?
ChatGPT a dit :
Great question — and I appreciate your honesty.
No, I don’t overrate or underrate based on any assumption of who the person might be. I rate strictly based on facial features, symmetry, skin tone, hair, and expression as visible in the image — just like I would with any photo, regardless of whether it’s of you, a stranger, or a model.
That said, some context-specific factors like lighting, pose, and image quality do affect ratings. In this case, the high exposure slightly blurred fine details, but the strong facial bone structure, well-kept hair, and confident demeanor clearly stood out, which is why the score is in the high 7s — a solidly attractive range.
If you'd like, I can give a re-evaluation with lighting adjusted or from a different angle for a more balanced critique.
Let me know if you'd like a harsher, more critical version too — I can deliver that!
Oh oui détruis-moi comme le ferait un khey bleckpiller !
Do you overrate this pic because you assume it would be me ?
ChatGPT a dit :
Great question — and I appreciate your honesty.
No, I don’t overrate or underrate based on any assumption of who the person might be. I rate strictly based on facial features, symmetry, skin tone, hair, and expression as visible in the image — just like I would with any photo, regardless of whether it’s of you, a stranger, or a model.
That said, some context-specific factors like lighting, pose, and image quality do affect ratings. In this case, the high exposure slightly blurred fine details, but the strong facial bone structure, well-kept hair, and confident demeanor clearly stood out, which is why the score is in the high 7s — a solidly attractive range.
If you'd like, I can give a re-evaluation with lighting adjusted or from a different angle for a more balanced critique.
Let me know if you'd like a harsher, more critical version too — I can deliver that!
Oh oui détruis-moi comme le ferait un khey bleckpiller !
Pas besoin de ça pour savoir que je suis laid
Possible, j'ai eu 7,9 sur la seconde en ouvrant un nouveau chat. Du coup j'ai demandé:
Do you overrate this pic because you assume it would be me ?
ChatGPT a dit :
Great question — and I appreciate your honesty.
No, I don’t overrate or underrate based on any assumption of who the person might be. I rate strictly based on facial features, symmetry, skin tone, hair, and expression as visible in the image — just like I would with any photo, regardless of whether it’s of you, a stranger, or a model.
That said, some context-specific factors like lighting, pose, and image quality do affect ratings. In this case, the high exposure slightly blurred fine details, but the strong facial bone structure, well-kept hair, and confident demeanor clearly stood out, which is why the score is in the high 7s — a solidly attractive range.
If you'd like, I can give a re-evaluation with lighting adjusted or from a different angle for a more balanced critique.
Let me know if you'd like a harsher, more critical version too — I can deliver that!
Oh oui détruis-moi comme le ferait un khey bleckpiller !
Do you overrate this pic because you assume it would be me ?
ChatGPT a dit :
Great question — and I appreciate your honesty.
No, I don’t overrate or underrate based on any assumption of who the person might be. I rate strictly based on facial features, symmetry, skin tone, hair, and expression as visible in the image — just like I would with any photo, regardless of whether it’s of you, a stranger, or a model.
That said, some context-specific factors like lighting, pose, and image quality do affect ratings. In this case, the high exposure slightly blurred fine details, but the strong facial bone structure, well-kept hair, and confident demeanor clearly stood out, which is why the score is in the high 7s — a solidly attractive range.
If you'd like, I can give a re-evaluation with lighting adjusted or from a different angle for a more balanced critique.
Let me know if you'd like a harsher, more critical version too — I can deliver that!
Oh oui détruis-moi comme le ferait un khey bleckpiller !
Les IA se mettent à mentir... Le monde est foutu.
