Un post=un enfant Palestiniens sauver des bombes israélienne

toi le goulag t'a complètement brisé

Post.

Je termine la journée du 3 juin 2025 par 4 victoires sur haxball.
HBReplay-2025-06-04-00h48m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]e6-4cab-9dbd-87b564485362

HBReplay-2025-06-04-00h42m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]3b-416f-a9df-d221a9c4246f

HBReplay-2025-06-04-00h37m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]f6-4c9b-a561-0a9497955750

HBReplay-2025-06-04-00h30m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]58-47c4-85d1-ddfdb6317329

HBReplay-2025-06-04-00h19m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]9b-47a0-9c41-c256957c9793




https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]e8-49e8-a5ed-9eb593dde302 Première et dernière fois que je bat un pro au haxball basket. Je termine la journée du 10 février par 1 victoire au basket.



Je termine la journée du 18 mars 2025 par un match nul puis une victoire en 7 v 7 futsal.
HBReplay-2025-03-18-23h07m.hbr2:
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]0b-4926-a050-005049379a26

HBReplay-2025-03-18-22h56m.hbr2:
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]97-418b-a8e9-3b341194fa7a

HBReplay-2025-03-18-22h45m.hbr2:
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]50-4540-ae31-faafa2eaec31

HBReplay-2025-03-18-22h31m.hbr2:
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]b6-4fa0-8e15-2f9356ac44f5





HBReplay-2025-05-29-21h48m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]e7-4e72-9247-97a63934f74f

HBReplay-2025-05-29-21h37m.hbr2:,
https://replay.thehax.pl/[...]ce-41af-9099-7d5ee911b4c2 Je termine la journée du 29 mai 2025 par 2 victoires en 5 v 5 RS avec Bolton en fs.

Post.


The Italian Doper is Back - Let's Expose the "Experts" Who Cleared Him


Apparently, experts proved that the amount of steroids found in Sinner's body was too small to give him a competitive advantage. That affirmation is more a propaganda strategy than science. The excuse isn't just flimsy, it's pathetic and scientifically unsound.

The ITTA so called independent experts cleared him in that steaming pile of a report that reeks of corruption and damage control. We know that the excuse was that Sinner got contaminated during a massage by his physio who had a bit of steroid cream called Clostebol on his pinky finger. That must be the biggest pinky in sport history because that tiny bit of cream somehow caused SInner to fail 2 doping tests 8 days apart. But the test results are where the story collapses. The first showed pg / mL and the second 8 days later showed 122. Basically no change. It's not how accidental contamination works.

Clostebol, like any typical steroid, doesn't stick around. Your body flushes it out pretty quickly once you stop using it. But in Sinner's case, nothing dropped. His level stayed exactly the same with even a very slight augmentation somehow. That doesn't scream accidental contamination but rather deliberate use.


That brings us to the " small amount "narrative. First of all, 120 picograms is not a small amount, at least if you look at how other players have been treated. Matilde Paoletti was busted for just 50 picograms of Clostebol. Mariano Tammaro, abnother Italian, got hit with a 2 year suspension for only 40 picograms which is only 1 / 3 of what Sinner had in his urine. In other's case, it was more than enough to destroy someone's career. More importantly, doping expert Dr Fritz Sorgel, head of the institute of biomedicine and pharmaceutical research, dismantled the small amount argument in one sentence : " The substance was found during a urine test, which cannot give a precise measure of how high the concentration of Cloestebol was at the time it was used. " Just because the test found just a small amount that was left in Sinner's system doesn't mean he only took a small amount. It only means that most of it had already been flushed out. Urine tests don't show how much was in the body when it mattered. They only show what is left over. If you see an empty beer glass with foam at the bottom, do you assume it was never filled with beer? It your gas tank is almost empty, does that mean it was never full? Of course not. So why some assume that a tiny amount of steroids in a urine sample means the athlete only took a tiny dose? Fiding only foam doesn't mean there was never beer. And finding only traces of steroids doesn't mean there was no doping. Sorgel also crushes another lie about the " It couldn't have enhanced his performance . " " Clostebol accelerates recovery. Muscle recovery is crucial in a grueling sport such as tennis.... because it allows hard training and high performance in competition. " In others words, it gives a competitive advantage. Faster recovery means better endurance, more consistent performance and the ability to train harder between matches. That's not a side effect. It's the whole point. And Sorgel isn't alone.


A leading WADA scientist told : " the misuse by other routes ( e.g. injection ) cannot be excluded, and differentiating by analytical means between the ways the anabolic agent entered an athlete's organism is difficult. Hence, disregarding Clostebol ( as a doping agent ) is probably not an option. "

Clostebol can absolutly be used to enhance performance and tests can't always reveal whether it was applied as a cream or injected. Maybe that's why Sinner's steroid levels didn't trop between the 2 tests taken 8 days apart : because he injected Clostebol. And the pinky massage story makes non sense. Sinner didn't even try to proof anything. He could have take a stand against WADA, but instead he made a shady deal behind the closed doors.

However, if Sinner truly wanted to clear his name, he could have submit the air sample. It's the gold standard recommended by actual doping experts.

Take Dr. Pascal Kintz for example, ren owed pharmacologists and toxicologist. He co authored a 2021 reearch paper laying out exactly how to prove a contamination.

" a low urine concentration can be interpreted in two different ways. 1 : It can be the end of a drug voluntarily used to enhance performance or 2 : it is the direct consequence of a contamination. " In other words, small amout of steroids found in urine doesn't rule out intentional doping.


The 4 steps to prove a contamination case were outlined.

Out of these 4 criterias, Sinner only met the first one. His urine samples showed a relatively low concentration of steroids.He fails number 3 and 4, his pinky finger massage story was non sense. Not to mention, the ITIA experts aren't independant at all. Hair test is important because according to actual experts, hair tests are significantly better at distinguishing between accidental contamination and intentional doping than urine tests. There are 4 reasons for this. 1 : Urine tests only capture a snapshot. What's in your system at that specific moment. Hair tests on the other hand, offer a timeline. Since hair grows slowly, it stores a record of drug exposure over weeks or even months. Hair test can detect doping over a prolonged period unlike urine tests. 2 : Hair tests can distinguish between creams and injections while urine tests can't. 3 : Hair tests are also sensitive enough to detect microdosing which is a common doping strategy, while urine tests can't. 4 : Hair tests are harder to cheat while you can flush your body to cheat a urine test. But that doesn't work on hair. Neither ITIA or WADA requested a hair sample. Matilde Paoletti proved her innocence and avoided suspension by voluntarily providing a hair sample.

Iga Swiatek also volunteered a hair sample when she failed a doping test in 2024.

Before September of 2023, Sinner was a promising player but he only reached 1 Grand Slam semi final, had a heavily losing record against top 10 players, just 13 wins and 26 losses. Then, since September 2023, Sinner went to 29 wins and 6 losses against top 10 opponents, won 3 of the 6 Slams he participated in ( before Roland Garros 2025 ). If you were Sinner, wouldn't you do everything to proof that your sudden improvement had nothing to do with steroids? Of course you would, but Sinner didn't. Instead of being transparent and forthcoming with evidence, Sinner and his team lied, covered up and evaded every step of the way. In May of 2024, just weeks after the ITIA provisionally suspended him in secret, he announced that he had a hip injury that would keep him away from tennis for a very long time. But the injury never happened. Then, he pulled out of the Olympics, claiming that he had Tonsillitis

And when the truth about his failing doping tests finally came out, he tried to gaslight the public with carefully prepared talking points. He didn't even fire Ferrara and Naldi until the scandal broke, 5 months after his failed test.

WADA challenged his innocence, instead of taking a stand, he cut an embarrassingly convenient backdoor deal that had every doping expert worth their salt saying that the system is broken.

https://image.noelshack.c[...]ran-2025-07-01-030954.png https://image.noelshack.c[...]ran-2025-07-01-031023.png https://image.noelshack.c[...]ran-2025-07-01-031055.png https://image.noelshack.c[...]ran-2025-07-01-031133.png
Why is the ITIA so convinved of Sinner's innocence despite this? It's likely that it has something to do with the fact that the ITIA is funded by the ATP. The same ATP whose CEO is Italian, the same ATP who has been pushing Sinner as the next face of the sport.

Post.


How Djokovic Ruled the Greatest Era in Tennis History


Another misinformation is that Djokovic is a weak era champion because he won 12 Grand Slams in a supposedly weak era between 2018 and 2023. But this ridiculous claim Consider first of all the childish sneakiness of defining the start of the supposedly weak era in 2018. Why 2018 and not 2017? As we all know, the peak period in the last decades was between 2011 and 2016 when Djokovic, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka all knew their prime. And according to himself, Federer was even better than he wa in the 2000s. An inconvenient truth to some.

Another misinformation is that Djokovic is a weak era champion because he won 12 Grand Slams in a supposedly weak era between 2018 and 2023. But this ridiculous claim Consider first of all the childish sneakiness of defining the start of the supposedly weak era in 2018. Why 2018 and not 2017? As we all know, the peak period in the last decades was between 2011 and 2016 when Djokovic, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka all knew their prime. And according to himself, Federer was even better than he wa in the 2000s. An inconvenient truth to some.

Another inconvenient truth is that during the 2011 / 2016 period, Federer only won 1 Grand Slam while Nadal won only 1 non clay Slam, the 2013 US Open. As soon as Djokovic was sidelined with an elbow injury, both started winning again. In 2017, Federer broke his streak of 4 consecutive seasons without a Grand Slam win and Nadal won his first non clay Slam after 4 years. We are also supposed to believe that it had nothing to do with Novak's absence And that the fact that their comeback ended in 2018 after Djokovic returned was just a coincidence. Wouldn't it make more sense to mark the beginning of the ellegedly weak era in 2017 when Djokovic and Murray were not playing? In 2019, right in the middle of the so called weak era, Nadal reached the semi finals in all 4 Slams, made 3 finals and won 2 of them. While Federer came within 1 point of winning Wimbledon, only to be denied by Djokovic in an epic final. Djokovic beat Nadal in the Australian Open, lost to Thiem in Roland Garros, beat Federer in Wimbledon and then lost to Wawrinka in the US Open. When some claim that Djokovic had it easy, this is the weak competition they are referring to.


Apparently, Djokovic continued to have it easy in 2020 when Wimbledon was cancelled, when he was also disqualified from the US Open, when he was also beat by Nadal at the 2020 Roland Garros final. Apparently, his lucky streak continued in 2022 when he was deported from Australia and banned from the US Open. Novak's road to greatness had been in fact one of the hardest in sport history. As early as 2022, Fedal fans claimed that Djokovic's era was over. After all, Alcaraz was the favourite of 2023 Roland Garros until Djokovic beat him in the quarter finals. And when he defeated Novak in the 2023 Wimbledon final that year, it was celebrated as the beginning of Alcaraz's era until Djokovic roared back and won Cincinatti, the US Open, Paris Bercy and the ATP finals, beating Alcaraz twice in the process and Sinner once. The narrative was then shifted from " It's the start of a new era " to " it's a weak era ". I won't even bother comparing Djokovic's opponents during this period to the players feathered placed in what was truly a weak era because I've already done that. The truth is that Djokovic was the most dominant force of the strongest era in tennis history, the one between 2011 and 2016. He dominated Federer and Nadal, the second and third best players of all time while also taking on prime Murray and prime Wawrinka. In those 6 seasons, Djokovic won 11 Grand Slams, 25 Masters 1000, a record 4 consecutive ATP finals wins, and he als became also the only man in history to win all 4 Slams on 3 different surfaces. In 2011, he won 41 consecutive matches to start the season, set the record with 5 Masters 1000 titles in a single season, went 4 - 1 against Federer and brutally obliterated prime Nadal in all the 6 matches they played including 2 straight victories on clay. And it was 2 Grand Slam finals and 4 Masters 1000 finals.

In 2015, Djokovic broke his own record with 6 Masters titles in a season, won a record 10 big titles, had a 18 - 5 record against Federer, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka combined. Perhaps nothing illustrates prime Novak's obscene level of dominance against elite competition than the fact that between 2011 and 2016, Djokovic recorded 19 or more wins against top 10 players in every single season. Federer and Nadal each managed 19 top 10 wins in a season only once in their entire careers. Need I remind you that nobody has played more matches against Federer, Nadal, Murray and Wawrinka than Djokovic. And that Djokovic holds the record for most matches and wins against top 5 and top 10 players. if I kept rolling out Novak's stats and records, it would be almost impossible to finish. But one last thing to know is that the last time Federer beat Djokovic in a Grand Slam was in 2012 while the last time Nadal beat him outside of clay was in 2013. So the idea that Novak benefited from their absence is ridiculous. It's them who needed Djokovic out of their way to win.

Post.

The Ridiculous Excuse Behind Sinner’s Doping Scandal


Instead of transparent investigation, we have seen a carefully managed narrative that present Sinner as an unfortunate victim of cirumstances rather than a player tested positive for a band anabolic steroid. From the very beginning, Sinner supporter both in the mainstream and on social media defended him relentlessly parting the same talking points. They claimed that Sinner was not intentionally doping but was contaminated by accident, that the amount of steroids found in his body was toosmall to enhance his performance and that the doping experts scientifically proved both of these claims. Apparently, the amount in Sinner's body didn't have any enhancing ebenfit given the small amount there was. If you are to question this version of ths story, you were immediatly bombarded with insults and being told about the more than 30 pages report that explains everythingSinner's excuse for being caught using steroids is the most critical piece of this entire scandal, yet it's the one subject the media desperatly avoids. Sinner's story has more holes than a golf course. It's also the key for answering the biggest question of this case : Was Sinner contaminated on accident as he claims or was he doping on purpose. The report does not prove that Sinner didn't benefit from doping. And the only thing the so called experts truly demonstrated was how far they were willing to suspend their belief to let Sinner off the hook.

Sinner's story beins in March 2024 during the Indian Wells tournament. On March 3rd, his physiotherapist Giacomo Naldi allegedly reached into his bag and cut his pinky finger on a scalpel that was inexplicably loose inside.

Luckily for him, Sinner's fitness coach Umberto Ferrara had the perfect remedy for cuts and scrapes, a spray called Trofodermin and we have the first extremely unusual circumstance. Trofodermin contains an anabolic steroid called Costebol and as we know, the use of anabolic steroids is strictly prohibited in sports.

Why is Sinner's fitness coach carrying around anabolic steroids. Sinner apologists will tell you that this spray is available in Italy without a prescription. You can buy it over the counter and that's why Ferrara bought it and brought it with him from Italy to the United States. But that doesn't make sense. Just because you can easily buy the spray in Italy doesn't explain why the coach or one of the top players would buy it and carry it with him halfway around the world. Some might say that maybe Ferrara didn't know that it contained steroids. But the problem with that explanation is that Ferrara is a fitness coach and qualified pharmacist.

How can a pharmacist in charge of Sinner's anti doping control not know that there is a spray that he bought contains a ban substance. Strange unless he is not a very good pharmacist. But there is a problem with that explanation as well. Because between 2018 and 2023, 38 Italian athletes have been tested positive for clostebol.

And Ferrara is Italian himself. So there is no way he could have forget that. According to the report, Mr Ferrara was " extremely experienced in matters of anti doping " Trofodermin in package has the word doping printed in capital letters inside a red circle with the slash through.

Ferrara then gives the spray to Giacomo Naldi to treat the cut on his pinky finger. He warns him that it contains Clostebol and that it shouldn't be applied anywhere near the player.

But according to Naldi's testimony, he doesn't remember Ferrara giving him the warning because he " may have been jetlagged "

This excuse is not only absurd, it's also riddled with contradiction. According to his own testimony he used the spray every morning from March 5th to March 13th 2024.

What kind of minor cut requires straight days of steroid treatment to heal? Naldi said that he put on a bandage on the day of the injury but removed it just 2 days later. If the cut was so minor that it didn't even need a bandage after 48 hours, why did he continue drenching it with steroid spray for more than a week afterward Both Naldi and Ferrara testified that Naldi only used the spray in Ferrara's bathroom. https://image.noelshack.c[...]ran-2025-06-11-180850.png

Post.



But why wouldn't Ferrara just give him the can to use whenever he wanted. Why was Naldi treating his finger exclusively in another man's bathroom.

Unless this was a precautionary measure to keep the spray away from Sinner which would mean that Naldi had to know it contained the banned substance. You can't have it both ways. And then there is the selective amnesia. Naldi testified that on the morning of March 10th, he applied 2 sprays of the Trofodermin Spray to his finger before giving Sinner a massage. And that's when the supposed contamination happened. To summarize, he doesn't remember being warned that the spray contains steroids but he somehow recalls the exact number of sprays he used on a specific day and then his memory conveniently fails him again when asked whether he washed his hands before massaging Sinner.

Memory seem to reappear or disappear depending on how useful it is to Sinner's case. This testimony becomes even less credible considering his background. Before joining Sinner's team, he worked for the Italian basketball club Virtus Bologna for 6 years between 2017 and 2023.

At that time, 2 players in that basketball were suspended for testing positive for Clostebol.

So even if Ferrara didn't warn him, how could Naldi not know tgat Trofodermin could contaminate Sinner? But the most bizarre thing about Naldi's testimony is not that it was accepted, it's that they went out of their way to fill in the blanks for him.

He said that he doesn't remember if Ferrara warned him. But the tribunal determined that he did. He says that he doesn't remember if he washed his hands. But the tribunal determined that he didn't.

Usually when witness testimonies contradict each other like Ferrara and Naldi, it raises red flags with the investigators. But the ATA tribunal went out of their way to accept him. You can start to see why so many players and doping experts are calling bullshit on these proceedings. Even if you want to believe that Sinner wasn't doping intentionally, how can anyone say that Ferrara and Naldi were not negligent. As John Vertheim of Sports Illustrated wrote : " This goes beyond negligence. This is at minimum, a staggering level of malpractice. "

The penalty for neglicence is a mandatory 2 years suspension.

But instead, the ITIA cleared Sinner and his team of any fault or negligence.

More importantly, no rational person can buy into Sinner's excuse especially when you consider that he and his team don't have a shred of evidence to back up their version of events. The only other witness is a friend of Sinner whose testimony also contradicts theirs.

And Ferrara doesn't even have an item as receipt to prove that he bought the spray. For all we know, there was no spray. They fabricated the entire story. And there are countless of other unanswered questions. Why does Naldi claim that he removed the bandage on March 5th when photographs show that he was still wearing it on March 10th, the day he allegedly contaminated Sinner. How many spray was Naldi putting onto his pinky to cause 2 failed doping tests taking 8 days apart. If Sinner was truly contaminated with only a trace amount of Trofofermin, then why did the second test taken 8 days later show virtually the same concentration of steroids in his system as the first?

Why didn't the levels drop significantly. Why did one of the supposed independent experts analyzing the samples know that the samples belonged to Sinner?

Why did one of the ITIA 's own lawyers suddently switch sides an defend Sinner against ITIA in this case?

Why didn't Sinner immadietly fire these 2 clowns?



Instead, he kept them on his team for 5 months, only cutting ties after his failed tests became public.

Post.

Myth Busted: Djokovic's Attacking Game Revealed



One of the most perpetuated misconceptions about Novak Djokovic is that he is a defensive player. There is an article from Simon Briggs that come from 2023, that debunks that myth. https://www.telegraph.co.[...]3-plan-skills-good-grass/

The article covers data gathered the last 12 months b efore the article was published, which proofs that Djokovic is one of the best attacking player of all time. Some people wrongly describe Novak as a boring defender, a backboard, a boring pushover. The article states :

A metric that calculates the percentage of points won by a player after being on defense durant the rally is " steal " On the stealscore leader, there were Medvedev in first, De Minaur in second and Alcaraz in third, with Djokovic being fourth.

Then the articles states :

He outscores his opponents in the " conversion " metric ( how many time you can drive home an attacking position and thus win the point ). And in this metric, Djokovic was first over the 12 early months before the article was published, with Tsitsipas, Cerundulo and Alcaraz.

Simply put, Djokovic was the most efficient attacking player on the tour. And here is more :

Djokovic's assertiveness is at his most pronounced on what tennis nerds call the " plus one " shot. When it comes to points after hitting the " Plus one " shot, he won a mindblowing 67,9% of points from this situation. His first groud stroke, usually a forehand is almost always driven deep and powerfully into one of the corners. So not only Novak is the most efficient at converting points from an attacking position, he is also the best at attacking the opponent's return Briggs then continues : "

On a clay court, the slow bounce means that an agile player has more chance of defusing this first Djokovic attack. Grass however is more about the first strike. It's more difficult to defend at Wimbledon because of the way the ball skids on after the bounce. This is the hardest Grand Slam to compete " steals " at while the French Open is the easiest. It's not coincidence that his 2 most successfull Grand Slams are the ones with the fastest surfaces : Australian Open and Wimbledon. That's also why he is the world record holder of the most ATP finals titles won. Just because he is also an excellent defender doesn't mean he is primarly a defender or only a defender. In fact, by comparision, Nadal is a more defensive player than Djokovic.

Post.

https://onche.org/topic/8[...]igre/133#message_16105066 https://onche.org/topic/8[...]un-arabe-remigre/197#last https://onche.org/topic/8[...]un-arabe-remigre/204#last https://onche.org/topic/8[...]-meuf-baise-cette-annee/3 https://onche.org/topic/6[...]-topic-du-cinema/230#last https://onche.org/topic/7[...]tre-interdits-en-france/3 https://onche.org/topic/8[...]es-sardinonches/1264#last https://onche.org/topic/8[...]s-le-cul-des-modos/3#last https://onche.org/topic/8[...]m-dans-le-cul-des-modos/2 https://onche.org/topic/8[...]r-les-super-modo-de-onche https://onche.org/topic/8[...]on-commence-a-foncrionner https://onche.org/topic/7[...]ule-pour-dupont-moretti/1 https://onche.org/topic/8[...]/j-ai-envie-de-faire-caca https://onche.org/topic/8[...]-dans-le-cul-de-gilbert/1 https://onche.org/topic/7[...]e-queue-dans-manuel-valls https://onche.org/topic/8[...]bombes-israelienne/3#last https://onche.org/topic/7[...]n-post-un-arabe-remigre/2 https://onche.org/topic/5[...]/1-post-1-cm-dans-mon-cul https://onche.org/topic/9[...]m-dans-le-cul-des-modos/1 https://onche.org/topic/9[...]059/the-human-centipede-2 https://onche.org/topic/8[...]ns-le-cul-de-netanyahou/1 A remplacer par des pavés.

Post.


Je gagne au jeu majority sur le serveur " Les experts du FF " le 10 juillet 2025.





Je termine à la première place aux quizz
sur le serveur les experts du FF aujourd'hui le 27 juin 2025.




troisième place quizz

Post.











































Les quizz que je remporte.

Post.




MAJORITY












QUESTION POUR UN CHAMPION

Post.

Post.

Post.

Post.

Post.

Post.