Ahi
Pas le droit de grouper les gens sauf pour l'etat
Pas le droit de grouper les gens sauf pour l'etat
Ahi
Pas le droit de grouper les gens sauf pour l'etat
Pas le droit de grouper les gens sauf pour l'etat
Grouper les gens ?
C'est déjà un résumé le zoomer ça se lit en 5min
Sinon en gros --> pour les entreprises qui proposent des services d'ia en Europe : interdit de manipuler l'opinion publique via IA, de reconnaissance faciale dynamique sauf certaine condition et autorisation, interdit d'exploiter les personnes en mauvais état, de faire du social scoring
Faire attention a pas bafouer les droit fondamentaux, au traitement de donnée, obligation de donner de la documentation technique pour certaine autre IA etc
Sinon en gros --> pour les entreprises qui proposent des services d'ia en Europe : interdit de manipuler l'opinion publique via IA, de reconnaissance faciale dynamique sauf certaine condition et autorisation, interdit d'exploiter les personnes en mauvais état, de faire du social scoring
Faire attention a pas bafouer les droit fondamentaux, au traitement de donnée, obligation de donner de la documentation technique pour certaine autre IA etc
Mais putain de décérébré t'es incapable de lire 12 lignes
Surtout que leur résumé est éclaté, il faut lire l'Act entier
Tu fais l'antisystème sur le fofo mais tu ne comprends rien à rien, RENSEIGNE-TOI FDP
Surtout que leur résumé est éclaté, il faut lire l'Act entier
Tu fais l'antisystème sur le fofo mais tu ne comprends rien à rien, RENSEIGNE-TOI FDP
La reconnaissance faciale est largement autorisée pour le coup vu que c'est soumis qu'a la décision d'une autorité administrative indépendante de l'utiliser ( ex arcom) et autres conditions particulièrement vague
Mais sinon ouai ça va juste délocaliser dans des pays sans législation ou plus flexible
La reconnaissance faciale est largement autorisée pour le coup vu que c'est soumis qu'a la décision d'une autorité administrative indépendante de l'utiliser ( ex arcom) et autres conditions particulièrement vague
Mais putain de décérébré t'es incapable de lire 12 lignes
Surtout que leur résumé est éclaté, il faut lire l'Act entier
Tu fais l'antisystème sur le fofo mais tu ne comprends rien à rien, RENSEIGNE-TOI FDP
Surtout que leur résumé est éclaté, il faut lire l'Act entier
Tu fais l'antisystème sur le fofo mais tu ne comprends rien à rien, RENSEIGNE-TOI FDP
J'ai lu 5 lignes, ça m'a fatigué frère.
J'ai lu 5 lignes, ça m'a fatigué frère.
(h) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement, unless and in so far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
Le truc des émotions est autorisé dans le médical ou en cas d'urgence imminente même si j'ai plus la ref aussi
Et je crois que c'est autorisé aussi si c'est pour confirmer être la personne qu'on prétend être
Et je crois que c'est autorisé aussi si c'est pour confirmer être la personne qu'on prétend être
(h) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement, unless and in so far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
Ce qui m'a le plus choqué c'est que n'importe quelle autorité indépendante peut autoriser l'utilisation d'identification a distance y compris des truc comme l'arcom (hadopi+CSA)
La putain de mauvaise blague quoi
La putain de mauvaise blague quoi
(h) the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement, unless and in so far as such use is strictly necessary for one of the following objectives:
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
(i) the targeted search for specific victims of abduction, trafficking in human beings or sexual exploitation of human beings, as well as the search for missing persons;
(ii) the prevention of a specific, substantial and imminent threat to the life or physical safety of natural persons or a genuine and present or genuine and foreseeable threat of a terrorist attack;
(iii) the localisation or identification of a person suspected of having committed a criminal offence, for the purpose of conducting a criminal investigation or prosecution or executing a criminal penalty for offences referred to in Annex II and punishable in the Member State concerned by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least four years. Point (h) of the first subparagraph is without prejudice to Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 for the processing of biometric data for purposes other than law enforcement.
Related: Recitals 32, 33, 38, 39, 40, and 41
2. The use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), shall be deployed for the purposes set out in that point only to confirm the identity of the specifically targeted individual, and it shall take into account the following elements:
(a) the nature of the situation giving rise to the possible use, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of the harm that would be caused if the system were not used;
(b) the consequences of the use of the system for the rights and freedoms of all persons concerned, in particular the seriousness, probability and scale of those consequences. In addition, the use of ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification systems in publicly accessible spaces for the purposes of law enforcement for any of the objectives referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (h), of this Article shall comply with necessary and proportionate safeguards and conditions in relation to the use in accordance with the national law authorising the use thereof, in particular as regards the temporal, geographic and personal limitations.
The use of the ‘real-time’ remote biometric identification system in publicly accessible spaces shall be authorised only if the law enforcement authority has completed a fundamental rights impact assessment as provided for in Article 27 and has registered the system in the EU database according to Article 49. However, in duly justified cases of urgency, the use of such systems may be commenced without the registration in the EU database, provided that such registration is completed without undue delay.
La dernière partie dis clairement que c'est autorisé a condition que blablabla si on a envie quand même
En gros pas en temps réel mais on va gentiment stocker tout ça au cas ou jean fédéraux décide de vérifier chacun de tes gestes dans le cadre d'une "enquête" ça fait flipper tout de même
Je vais lire ça
Je vais lire ça
This land is worth more than the industries that want it.
Putain l'annexe 3 est glaçant
--> 5. Accès et jouissance des services privés essentiels et des services et prestations publics essentiels :
(a) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés par les autorités publiques ou pour le compte de celles-ci afin d'évaluer l'éligibilité des personnes physiques aux prestations et services essentiels d'assistance publique, y compris les services de santé, ainsi que pour octroyer, réduire, supprimer ou réclamer ces prestations et services ;
(b) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés pour évaluer la solvabilité des personnes physiques ou établir leur score de crédit, à l'exception des systèmes d'IA utilisés à des fins de détection de la fraude financière ;
(c) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés pour l'évaluation des risques et la tarification en ce qui concerne les personnes physiques dans le cas de l'assurance vie et de l'assurance maladie ;
(d) les systèmes d'IA destinés à évaluer et à classer les appels d'urgence émanant de personnes physiques ou à être utilisés pour répartir les services de première intervention d'urgence, y compris la police, les pompiers et l'aide médicale, ou pour établir un ordre de priorité dans la répartition de ces services, ainsi que les systèmes de triage des patients dans le cadre des soins de santé d'urgence.
Tout ça est autorisé @valmont
--> 5. Accès et jouissance des services privés essentiels et des services et prestations publics essentiels :
(a) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés par les autorités publiques ou pour le compte de celles-ci afin d'évaluer l'éligibilité des personnes physiques aux prestations et services essentiels d'assistance publique, y compris les services de santé, ainsi que pour octroyer, réduire, supprimer ou réclamer ces prestations et services ;
(b) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés pour évaluer la solvabilité des personnes physiques ou établir leur score de crédit, à l'exception des systèmes d'IA utilisés à des fins de détection de la fraude financière ;
(c) les systèmes d'IA destinés à être utilisés pour l'évaluation des risques et la tarification en ce qui concerne les personnes physiques dans le cas de l'assurance vie et de l'assurance maladie ;
(d) les systèmes d'IA destinés à évaluer et à classer les appels d'urgence émanant de personnes physiques ou à être utilisés pour répartir les services de première intervention d'urgence, y compris la police, les pompiers et l'aide médicale, ou pour établir un ordre de priorité dans la répartition de ces services, ainsi que les systèmes de triage des patients dans le cadre des soins de santé d'urgence.
Tout ça est autorisé @valmont