Georges SOROS qualifié de TERRORISTE dans un livre de stratégie militaire chinois datant de 1999

In this sense, there is reason for us to maintain that the financial attack by George Soros on East Asia, the terrorist attack on the U.S. embassy by Usama Bin Laden, the gas attack on the Tokyo subway by the disciples of the Aum Shinri Kyo, and the havoc wreaked by the likes of Morris Jr. on the Internet, in which the degree of destruction is by no means second to that of a war, represent semi-warfare, quasi-warfare, and sub-warfare, that is, the embryonic form of another kind of warfare.

Judging by this kind of standard, who can say that George Soros is not a financial terrorist?

The main protagonist in this section of the history book will not be a statesman or a military strategist; rather, it will be George Soros.

Taking the big financial crocodiles as represented by Soros, on the strength of a daily business volume exceeding US$120 billion in floating capital, he used financial derivative methods as well as free economic regulations to repeatedly change his attitude and play tricks to foment trouble, so as to bring about one financial upheaval after another.

Soros's logic is "I entered the room to steal money because your door was not locked." In this way, he does not have to be responsible for destroying the economies of other nations and throwing the political order of others into disarray.

- Untrestricted Warfare (La Guerre hors limites), Qiao Liang et Wang Xiangsui