CHAÎNE de RIRE pour le T

+ BMG Il a fait quoi ?

Oh moi je le trouvais rigolo

Oh noon

La lâcheté de ce genre de topic

Je pensais qu’il avait la modé dans sa poche

Quelle surprise

Et il vient aussitôt de recréer quinze secondaires

Il a fait prout

Coubeh

The Female Loyalty Study So Dangerous the Nazis BURIED It

A single buried sociological report. The SS hid it, classified it. It's a key to understand the modern world. It starts with Himmler. What he wanted to build needed complete commitment and unawering of every German. Path was valor in battle, stoic duty, and even a willingness to die for the state. As for the women they were the guardians of the hearth, mothers of the race, loyal stable center around which the warrior could orbit. The propaganda was about to reinforce this image : the faithful German women, her heart swelling with, her loyalty unshakable. Detail obsessed, Himmler wanted to know if this was true. So in early 1940s he commissioned a secret study. It was an internal SS security matter. SS Oberfuhrer Wilhem Spengler had the task. The orders was to investigate the morale and loyalty women to their men who were fighting at the front. Spengler and his team had unprecedneted access. They could cross reference male censorship reports, interview soldiers on leave, debrief field police and analyze internal party communications. Imagine you are a German soldier, 19 years old freezing in a foxhole outside Stalingrad. The only link you have to your home is letters, specifically letters from your sweetheart. Imagine the soldier receiving letters of how she misses him, how proud she is. Now imagine getting a mail call from your mother telling you that his girlfriend has been seen with a french prisonner of war assigned to local work detail. Then saying that she has been moving with a high ranking party nazi official with a heart condition that keeps him out of the war. This wasn't an isolated tragedy. According to the Spengler report, it was an epidemic. Initial findingss were so shocking that Spengler team deepened their investigation. They discovered that infidelity among soldier's wives and girlfriends was not just common but rampant.

In major cities like Berlin, Hambourg and Cologne, estimates suggest that half of womens with partners at the front were engaged in extra marital affairs. The report documented with precision that women were overwhelmingly unfaithful to men who represented one of these 2 things : heightened status or immediate security. Basically leaving soldiers for high ranking functionaries, industrialists and factory managers, men with power and privilege. Or they were taking up with foreign workers and prisoners or wars as a transactional exchange. The report concluded that the women's loyalty was not to the man or to the nation but to a primal calculus or survival. Fraus Schmidt, a composite figure drawn from the report's case studies. Her husband a sergeant in Afrika Korps was missing, presumed captured. Within 3 months, she became the mistress of a local Gauleiter's assistant. She wrote to the Red Cross to stop searching for her husband, stating it was a waste of ressources. When her neighbor confronted her she reportedly said : " A living dog is better than a dead lion" This was hypergamy at its rawest and brutal form. Divorce rates in Germany sky rocketed, initiated predominantly by women those husbands were at the front. They were legally severing ties to men they perceived as losers, as ghosts that had not yet had the decency to die. The report provided empirical, data driven proof that the idealized concept of women loyalty was a fiction. If this information leaked it would decimate any fighting spirit of the Germany Army. What soldier would risk his life for a homeland that already cuckholded him? Himmler was furious, not toward the women but the report itself. The solution was not to adress the problem but bury the evidence. Spengler report was classified as Gehemei Reich Sacher ( Secret Reich Matter ). Locked away in the deepest vaults of the SS archives. It was a moment where ideology collided with reality.

This case study demonstrates universal principle. Those in power will always seek to control the narrative.The most dangerous proof to any power structure is the truth about women's loyalty on men. The national socialist regime for all its wrong things was a gyocentric state in its demands on male sacrifice, demanding that men could be disposable, that they offer their lives as currency for the state's expansion with the promise that their women would be protected and remain faithful. The pattern didn't die in 1945 but evolved. The modern world makes the same implicit contract witih men : work yourself to an early grave in a soul crushing job, take on debt, assume all the risks, be a provider. Promised reward? Stability, respect, and the loyal women by your side. But that loyalty is conditional, on your performance, status, ability to keep providing a sense of security and advantage. When you fail, show vulnerability, when the market crashes and lose your job, the mechanism of betrayal is eerily similar. The divorce papers replace the Dear John letter. But underlying principle is same. The Spengler report is not just an historical document but a mirror showing men's worth in the eyes of the system and often in the eyes of the women. The system's condition is transactional. Understanding this is not succumbing to bitterness. It's the moment you stop living for external validation and start building a core of unshakable self worth that cannot be taken from you by the fickleness of circumstance or betrayal of others.

The men who came home from the POW camps in 1945 or trudged back from the eastern front didn't just find their cities in ruin but also their lives stolen, their wives gone, their children calling another man father. The silence falling upon Germany wasn't just the silence of defeat but the silence of men psychologically castrated first by the state but then by the peace that offered them no justice. The triumphing allies ironically perpetuated the same cycle of male disposability. The burial of the report was only the beginning. The real tragedy was when the truth was left to rot in the ground. For millions in Germany the battle was not over but transforming. First the war of steel and fire, then an insidious war of the spirit. The soldiers returned in a world they were promised was worth dying for. The returning soldier isn't a returning hero but a ghost, an inconvenient reminder of a past everyone prefer to forget. The image of the rubble women served as a symbol of Germany resilience,c learing the bricks with bare hands. And there was some true in this. But this image served to obscure a darker, more complex reality. It whitewashed the social fragmentation Spengler report documented. For every women clearing rubble out of civic duty, another one secured her survival through more pragmatic and often ruthless means. The rubble these men had to clear wasn't just physical but rubbles of their own identities, shattered illusions of their place in the world. The mechanisms of betrayal were coldly efficient. Many returning soldiers found that their wives had initiated divorce proceedings during their absence, often on the ground of abandonment. The court with staff who wanted to show their " denazification ", overwhelmingly sided with the women. Uncle Eric Syndrome., it's where a child would be taught to call the returning biological father uncle to avoid confusing them them with the new man in the house who represented stability and access to resources.

And the Allied powers would become the actors of the final act of the Spengler report. In 1945 no one offered more security and status than a membber of the victorious Allied Armies.The American soldier represented the ultimate hypergamous leap. For a German women, an American men was the ticket out of starvation and post war years despair. The term Fraulein Wunder was coined often with a sleazy comedic tone that masked the profound tragedy at its core. It described eager fraternization between German women and Allied soldiers. For the emaciated and defeated German men it was the final humiliation of their utter disposability. They lost the war and also the women to the men who defeated them. This was a trauma with no name, no recognition and no outlet. To cmplain was seen as a sore loser or nazi sympathizer. They were expected to swallow their pride, grief, rage, and rebuild their nation that betrayed them twice. This created a generation of silent, hollow men. They became the stoic, emotionally distant fathers and grandfathers of the German Vertschaft's wonder, the economic miracle. The male spirit was not broken on the battlefield but systematically dismantled in the quiet treachery of the post war home. The trauma was inherited. The sons of these mens grew up with a father who was a ghost in his own house, physically here but not emotionaly. They inherited a legacy of shame, silence and deep unspoken suspicion of women and the institutions that protected them. The chain of male trauma was forged link by link. From the state that demanded everything to the women whose loyalty proved conditional, to the sons raised without a map to their own masculinity. Spenger report's suppression was just ensuring that the wound was never to be cleaned nor threatened, just be ignored.

The modern world makes the same but more implicit contract with men. You are expected to sacrifice your health, time, youth spirit on the alter of the corporate ladder. You are told to be a provider, a protector,a stoic rock. The promised reward is a family, a loyal partner, a place of respect. But the system just like the Nazi state was built on a lie. It constructs a social and elgal framework that makes betrayal not just easy but often incentivized. When a man fails to provide, loses his job, suffers a mental health crisis, when he simply shows vulnerability, the mechanisms of disposability click into place with the same cold efficiency as a 1944 divorce court. The new Gauleiter's assistant is a very successfull CEO or the charming man of the office. The principle is identical. Your worth cannot and shouldn't be contingent on your utility to a women or a state viewing you as disposable. Your mission shifts from seeking external validation to building an internal fortress. Your purpose is no longer to be a hero in a story written by others but to become the author of your own story. Your purpose is to build yourself. Cultivate a strenght not dependent on the approvals of others. Build a life that cannot be taken from you by the fickleness of circumstance. The bury of the Spengler report was the bury of the system's willingness to sacrifice the masculine soul.











How Women Behaved When Civilization Truly Ended - The Great Plague Diaries

Scent of death in London was a thick putrid perfume seeping through closed shutters, lodged himself in the back of throats. It was the Great Plague of 1655. 100 000 people dead, 1 / 4 in London in 18 months. The concept of future itself evaporated. Diaries of men like Samuel Pepsi, and the Reverend Thomas Vincent and the heartbreaking bills of mortality reveal a pattern of behavior. Consider the story of a locked in wife, a tale buried in the municipal records on the parish of St Giles in the Fields. When a household was infected, the authorities would nail the door shut, condemning healthy and sick to die together. One merchant named Edward Cooper began to show the tokens, the telltale black spots that signaled the end. His wife, a women known in the records as Amelia was healthy. As the searchers marked the door she pleaded with them. Her pleas turned to screams. That night by the light of a single tallow candle she did the unthinkable, dragging him down the stairs to barricade him alone in the cold, dank cellar. She then retreated to the upper floor, shouting down through the floorboards that she had isolated the infection, that she was now safe. For 3 days the pounding from the cellar door ceased. When the searchers unsealed the door 3 days later she was emaciated but alive. She waited, listening to his final feeble struggles. When civilization constraints vanish, the abstract notion of loyalty tend to vanish. The bills of mortality, the weekly death counts published with grim regularity told a statistical story screaming of this behavior. In peak weaks of the plague the mortality of the men skyrocketed compared to women. Officially it was told it was due to men being more likely to be in public. But the diaries tell a different, more sinister story.
Reverend Thomas Vincent wrote os families where the man would fall first ill. He describes the heart rending cries from sealed houses and whispers of neighbors, women, abandoning their stricken husbands. If they could bribe the watchmen they could sometimes flee. Often however they would just retreat to the safest part of the house. The image of the nurturess angel of the house was under ultimate duress replaced by a pragmatic survivalist whose primary allegiance was to herself.








Carl Jung EXPOSED The Hidden Reason Women Create Drama


Carl Jung called it the shadows, parts of us we burry because it's too ugly, raw, real. For women that shadows crave drama like drug because it's the fastest way to feel alive. In 19th century in France women in high society would intentionally faint in public just to be seen. Doctors calls it vapors. To force connection through chaos. The we need to talk text tends to be the new version. The more civilized we become the more our shadow demands blood. Notice that after a fight, the sex is electric. It's not a coincidence but biology. Drama releases same chemicals as passion, cortisol, adrenaline, dopamine. A 2017 study from the journal of social and personnal relationship found taht couples who fought more reported higher levels of connections but only short term. Answer is not becoming robots but in dragging the unconscious into the light.

.

The Forbidden Research on Female Pair-Bonding They Tried to Erase

A symphony of quiet mornings, a future painted in the warm hues of mutual dedication. It's the joy we are all sold. But the collapse comes with a slow chilling silence. The shared goals become her personal demands, the protective instincts exhibited reframed as controlling behavior, the dedication put met with a quiet transactional assessment. He is left bewildered, holding the shattered pieces of a contract he didn't realize was unilateral. In the modern scrips he reads, he was too needy, didn't meet her needs. But In his gut, that primal core that modern therapy cannot touch, he knows it's a superficial diagnosis for a deep festering wound. He feels a profound sense of unreliability in the very structure of human connection he was taught to believe in. It's a data point in a pattern observed, documented and systematically erased for over a century. In 1933 in Berlin among the books consumed by the flames were the fundational texts of the Institute of Sexual Wissenschaft, the institute of sexology. Meanwhile the SS transported documents from the institute's vault to secret facilities outside Munich. Among them, some useful researchs on human relations dynamics. The crown jewel was a longitudinal study so vast and intrusive that it makes other modern social science project looks like a child's doodle. Codenamed project Anchor, initiated in the late 1920s. The researchers tracked over 10 000 married and cohabiting couples across Germany from every social class and region. They didn't rely on surveys and self reported data. the fatal flaw of modern psychology. They used a network of field observers, cross referenced with medical records, financial transactions and analyzed the content of private correspondance.

The data shattered the myth of eternal romantic love and revealed a stark biological beneath the veneer of culture and emotion. They identified what they named the Bindungschfella, the bonding threshold. It was a quantifiable limit to a women's innate pair bonding capacity directly tethered to her hypergamous imperative. The study suggests that a women's ability to form a truly indelible life long bond with a male partner was not a given but a fragile window highly dependent on a specific set of external and internal conditions. When a women perceved his partner as at or near his peak of his social and resource providing potential relative to her own options, the bond would lock, become a source of profound loyalty and stability. But the data indicated that if a man's trajectory flattened or declined, or if the women's perception of her own market value increased, the bond would begin to decay at a biochemical level. The researchers documented a measurable increase in what they coded as mate guarding anxiety in the men whose status had fallen and a corresponding increase in exploratory behavior in their wives, more time spent in social situations without their husbands, a newfound interest in a man who still possessed status and resources. It wasn't about morality but rather a brutal evolutionary algorithm.
Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin and the father of eugenics believed everything could be quantified, even beauty and character. In the 1870s he conducted a forgotten experiment at an international health exhibition, created an anthropometic laboratory where he measured thousands of people. He attempted to create a beauty map of the British isles. He would walk in cities with a piece of paper in his pocket and a pushpin, pricking a paper to tally the women he saw as beautiful, indifferent or repulsive. He was not just measuring beauty but attempting to map the distribution of the most potent currency in female hypergamous arsenal. he noted that the density of beautiful women seemed higher in wealthy urban centers and spa towns where high status men congragated. As if the human flower was unconsciously blooming more vibrantly in the soil where it was most likely to be pollinated by the right kind of bee. he stumbled upon a non conscious geographical expression of the mating market. At the 1950s at the peak of American post war marital boom psychologist named James McConnelll at the University of Michigan made a discovery. He was studying planerian flatworms, simple creatures that can regenerate when cut in half. He taught them to associate a light with an electric shock. Then he grounds up the trained worms and fed them to untrained cannibalistic worms. Untrained worms who had eaten their educated brethren demonstrated a significant acceleration in learning the same light shock association. As if the memory, the engram, was a physical substance that could be transferred. The scientific community reacted with horror. McConnell was ridiculed. They wanted to preserve the myth of infinitly malleable socially constructed humans
15 minutes. Female bonding is a biological mechanism with a master key. That key is not love, kindness or shared values. It's a man's unwavering, demonstrable and ever increasing value in the world. True value in hypergamus calculus is trajectory. If a man's perceived momentum and potential for dominance within his chosen hierarchy, it's the palpable sense that he is force on an upward path that his tomorrow will be more formidable than his today. This is the raw primal gata that a women's subconscious continuously scans for. The forbidden research suggests that her pair bonding circuitry doesn't lock onto the man as he is but onto the man he is becoming. The moment that trajectory stalls, that biological alarms begins to ring. The slow withdrawal of affection, the increasing criticism,the emotional distance that seems to have no cause. The cause is not in the moment but in the forecast. She isn't reacting to who you are today but to the bleakness of your tomorrow This is why a women can leave a good man who is stable and kind for a worse man who is chaotic but radiating potential. She isn't choosing the man but the trajectory. Studies repeatedly showed a gendered disparity in abandonment rate when a spouse becomes becomes seriously ill. A landmark study published in the journal Cancer in 2009 found that a man is 7 times more likely to be divorced or abandoned after a diagnosis of a serious illness like cancer or multiple sclerosis than a women is. The rate of abandonement when the wife was the patient was only 3%. But when the husband was the patient, it skyrocketed to 21%.Illness is a violent declaration of incapacity in a man. A trajectory killer; His value has plummeted to 0. The women's pair bonding circuitry programmed for survival above all else interprets this as a catastrophic system failure and begins the process of severance.
Value is not communicated by words because words are currency for our conscious mind. Hypergamis impulse operates in the ancient non verbal language of the subconscious. Albert Mehrabian made researchs about non verbial languages. In the 1960s, he provided study of how we communicate feelings and attitudes; He concluded that only 7% of the communication is by the words we say, 38% by the tone of our voice, 55% by the body language. He discovered the transmission channel for the hypergamis signal. A women doesn't access a man's trajectory by reading his business plan but by reading the primal uncontrollable data of his presence. His posture, calm steadiness of his gaze, the timbre of his voice, the lack of fidgeting, the slow and deliberate nature of his movements. These are the true metrics of his internal state and by extension his position in the hierarchy. A man truly on a powerful trajectory carries himself with a quiet unsahakable certainty. He doesn't seek approval but grants his attention. Subconscious energetic boundary a man maintains that defines reality on his terms. When a man's frame is strong it broadcast high value trajectory and the women's pair bonding mechanism locks on. When his frame is weak, when he is seeking validation, when his voice quavers and his shoulder slumps he is broadcasting a failing trajectory and the bond begins to dissolve. This is why even a rich man if he is coming home seeking emotional reassurance from his wife after a bad day, he can feel her pull away. It's about frame more than money. Quality and permanence of pair bond is not primarly determined by the women but the men. He has the key. His mission and purpose is his unawering commitment to his own ascent is th sole factor that holds the entire structure together. This is the ultimate refutation of the blue pill fantasy that relationship are 50 / 50 partnership built on mutual emotional labor.
The man must be 100% committed to his own trajectory, value and mission that exists independently of the women, the relationship or the family. Doing so he generates a gravitational field of stability and security. The women in turn is able to give 100% of her loyalty, nurturing and support because the foundation of his value is unshakable. Her 0% isn't a lack of effort but a state of not having to be the man or not having to manage his emotional state, of being able to exist in the sanctuary his purpose provides. Become the man whose trajectory is so undeniable that her biological imperative has no choice but to lock on for life. Don't be the ship captain begging the sea to be less stormy.

" Trop de tout ".

Why The Sexual Revolution Was Worse Than You Thought

Sexual morality is one of the biggest aspect of any civilization. For over 1 000 years, western nations or kingdoms lived by christian sexual morality. Christianity especially catholicism teaches that sexuality is meant for marriage and violating this standard is a sin. The supposedly liberal attitude from Greeks and Romans are exaggerated. Although a bit different from the Christian morality they still believed in some sexual standard. The sexual world in western nations only came relatively recently under regimes that we still live under. In the US at the beginning of 20th century, 95% of the country identified as christian and abortion, pornography and sodomy were outlawed. Divorce and illegitimacy were more rare although legal. The progressive moment of the time was concerned about strenghtening the country's moral value. This was known as anti vice. In the 2020s today a majority of American have developed libertarian values on moral and sexual issues. Many of the vices once illegal are now allowed. Casual sex, abortion and divorce are common. Christianity has been replaced by a widespread sense of nihilism, being the believe that morality doesn't exist and values doesn't matter. Despite this a lot of people know deep down that something is wrong. Polls show that the majority think that the morals has gotten worse. Sexual revolution movement came in the 1950s and the 1960s. It sought to change American modest moral values to an unrestricted free for all. An America of strong families was turned into a mess.
Christian sexuality immorality has rules that are not liberal. The Bible contains several passages containing sexual immorality that they condemn : sodomy, bestiality, adultery, crossdressing and more. All are condemned in various biblical passages. In the book of Matthew, Jesus said that marriage is between on man and one women for life. The Christian churches develop doctrines that reflected this modern sexual morality. As such modesty and chastity are christian virtues while lust and hedonism are sins. Satan isn't only a manipulator but a tempter who offers short term pleasure at the expense of their eternal soul. Christianity deeped and fully explained the concept of natural law developed by the ancient Greek philosophers. By this account sexual morality wasn't a matter of arbitrary, or changing value but of objective truth. Modesty and chastity are virtues because they push man towards the full realization of his nature and finality. There is a natural order for human sexuality ordained by God and it's correct for humans to obey it. This is the basis of much of the Catholic morale philosophy. All of this is why Christians oppose sexual liberation. America began as an english colony so inherited the Protestant direction that England had been going down since King Henri VII. Originally it was a Catholic nation but they broke from the churches under the reigns of King Henry VII and Elizabeth I in the 1500s. Therefor in the young US Protestantism was the dominant religion. However Catholics were tolerated in certain parts of the country. Religious views ot eh American Founding Fathers were complicated. Most came from Protestant background and believed that religion was critical to American society. Some like Jefferson or Madison were more deistic. They picked what parts of God and the Bible they believed in based on what they deemed retional. This was contrasted by founders such as Samuel Adams and John Jay who is president of American Bible Society.
The American founding fathers were also influenced by the ideas of the so called enlightenment and the philosophy of John Locke. Locke emphasized what he called the natural rights granted by God that could be determined through reason alone. He also advocated the indifference of the state toward religion. This was very different from traditional governing philosophy where the state tended to work with the church towards religious objectives. founders adopted many of Locke's ideas and what they created became known as the American liberalism. Since founders were of various Christian denominations and some deists, they wrote religious tolerance into the US Constitution. Some of the founders wanted a vague form of Christianity to be made the official religion of the US government. The proposal lost out. The founders were not religiously Orthodox but they were not hardcore secularists who believed taht religion should be banned from public life like modern atheists do. John Adams famously said : " Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other. " Despite founding fathers admiring religion, the Constitution and the American liberalism put vague ideas of liberty and equality above all else, even God. Founding ideology also never resolved the conflict between the objective morality and the natural law vs moral relativism and apathy. All of this opened the door for long term negative consequence for American morality. American federal judge and author Robert Bork wrote : " The signers of the Declaration of Independance took the moral order that they inherited for granted. It did not occur to them that the document's rethorical flourishes might one day become dangerous if that morale order weakened. "
America's lack of official religious direction combined with it being founded on vague notions of liberty would go on to be exploited heavily for so called sexual liberation, far beyond the intention of any of the founders. Colonial America had anti obscenity laws including laws against buggery. After, this offense carried severe penalties and no founding father expressed a problem with it. All of this notwithstanding Christianity remained the dominant religion of the US through the 1 700s, 1 800s and early 1 900s, most of this was Protestant denominations but Catholics didn't make up an important minority. As time went on, their important would increase at time. In fact by 1 900, Catholicisme was the single largest church within the USA. By the early 1900s the USA was a global superpower. Government still banned things like porn, abortion, sodomy, etc... Devout Christian like Anthony Comstock used their government position to fight hard against vice and degeneracy. Comstock laws were a series of laws that banned transport of obscene material through the mail and they were strictly enforced. Liberty in America was not seen to do whatever you wanted. To protect liberty, hedonism had to be restrained. Positive freedom is view that true freedom comes from being allowed to pursue virtue. negative freedom asserts that freedom comes from lac of personal restraints. Despite this there were cracks in the American foundation freedom. Freedom of religion meant that Christianity despite its power had no official, legal position as part of the government. This left openings for anti Christian actors to enter and subvert the state. At the same time affluence and decadence began to make American complacent and materialistic. In the 1920s, President Calvin Coolidge warned the country : " We must not sink into pagan materialism. We must cultivate the reverence which our fathers had for the things that are holy. " July 4th speech in 1926.
Like most of educated Americans back then he believed morality was vital. People start thinking that material goods are a valid replacement for the divine and that technology is a valid replacement for God. This thinking becomes more common with societal affluence. To make things worse, WW1 created a sense of nihilism and sadness that spread across the whole Western World. European civilization and history started to be called into question.Still today most of the countries who fought WW1 never had the power and influence they had prior to it. Pope Benedict the 15th referred WW1 as the suicide of civilized Europe. The forces hostile to European civilization saw this as their opening to start seizing power. It's no coincidence that after WW1, marxism and modern art grew vastly in popularity. At the same time American protestant elites began losing their faith and turn their attention to moneymaking. They began to adopt early aspects of the sexual revolution. Anglicanism for example approved birth control as morally valid in 1930. By the 1950s most protestants became pro birth control. Many Christians denominations became about being nice, being tolerant rather than any serious moral value. When your goal is simply to be nice it's easy to be manipulated and walked over. Nice and good are not the same thing. Jesus drove moneychangers from the temple after all. Being good doesn't mean someone has to be nice or tolerant toward everything. On top of this, Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. also came to the US and began to promote their own morality which was often directly at oods with the majority of Christian morality. Jewish sources note how they became prominent in Hollywood and the media industry. This would have a profound impact on America. American Jews tended to be more permissive on all issues related to sex than the general population. But there was some backlash to the slipping of American standard.

Même certains gros tarax du forum n'ont pas pris autant. Chaud.



American Catholics were ont of the last group fighting for traditional sexual morality. They created the production code, a censorship code that Catholic businessmen forced Hollywood in the film industry to follow. It banned all sexual degeneracy from films, for many years obliged and if Hollywood didn't oblige, Catholics would boycott their films and devastate their profits. On top of banning things like sex and nudity, the code required that no picture shall be produce that will lower the morale standards of those who see it. Hence the sympathy of the audience should never be thrown to the side of crime wrongdoing, evil or sin. It's the Hayes Code. For over 30 years these standards would remain in place and produce some of the best films in American history. But WW2 and its aftermath would change everything. In the wake of the rise of fascism and communism, the new field of psychology began to be used for political objectives. it started painting traditional sexual values as a contributor of what it called the authoritarian tendencies. Sexual liberation was proposed as a supposed antidote. Psychologists like Theodore Adorno decided that the Western morality would have to be destroyed and replaced in order for fascism to never rise again. Many of these psychologists were directly founded by American intelligence agencies like the CIA who found their ideas useful in deradicalizing political opposition to American liberalism. To quote the 2002 British documentary " The century of the self " : " Those in power used Freud's theories to try to control the dangerous crowd in the age of mass democracy. " Psychology ceased to be about trying to understand human mind and became about controlling it. Decadence and materialism already has been developing in America. The sexual revolution has begun.
Invention and spread of home television was decisive in changing the morality of America. In 1950, 15% of American households had a TV. By 1960, it was 85%. Almost every TV channel at this time was controlled by one of three networks : ABC, NBC and CBS. These were heavily tied to the US intelligence agencies who used them to push their political agenda. This was Operation Mockingbird. When cultural revolution began in the 1960s, new stations gave the protesters overwhelmingly positive coverage meanwhile those who defended American culture and Western traditions were painted as the villains. A new pop culture based on the latest shows movies and music began to develop in America, replacing much of its ancient European culture that has been passed down for generations. It resulted into the loss of people's roots. Culture of Hollywood and Washington DC were exported to the entire USA and Regional cultures started to decline. Despite the motion culture the producer code still being in effect in TV and film industry began to push the boundaries of sexual immorality. The capitalistic pursuit of profit and the liberal pursuit of sexual hedonism ended up being a match made in heaven or should we say, hell. By mid 1960 the production code was broken so often it was abandoned. The floodgates were open for total media degeneracy and companies happily obliged sex, drugs, abortion, homosexuality and more all flooded American culture.Both high level institutions and youth movements were the backbone of the new sexual culture. Elite universities began broadcaste pornography to their students and encouraged them to attend. Liberal and marxist professors saw the 1960s as an opportunity to destory the long held Christian values of the West that they could paint as authoritarian and fascist. But in the judicial system the sexual revolution found its true success. With American morality transformed, judges began to do their part.
In 1947, Everson vs Board of education, the Supreme Court commanded states that they could not grant religious privileges to anyone prior to that point. States didn't have to abide by freedom of religion as outlined in the federal constitution and they often gave Christians preferential treatments. Separation of church and state as we know today is less than 80 years old. This decision set the stage for a new form of secularism. So severe we can call it anti religious. The Supreme Court then took direct aim at America's morality. Anti pornography laws were the first things gutted. Roth vs USA in 1957, Miller vs California rendered all anti pornogrpahy law moot. Birth control was the next thing to be legalized nationwide in 1965 with Griswold v Connecticut. Author Eichel Michael Jones explains why contraception is so signifiant it's the thin end of the wedge that disconnects sex from its natural purpose of reproduction. Once sex loses its original purpose, moral chaos is in far behind. After the legalization of contraception in the 1960s as he predicted, abortion would follow with Roe vs Wade in the 1970s. All of this legalized from the same anti Christian hyper individualist moral philosophy. That personal pleasure is the highest value of life. This is continued into modern America with things like LGBT movement and transgenderism. The slippery slope was real because the same arguments for legalizing porn can be copy paste into all other sexual issues. Over years the American left became anti Soviet and instead embraced embraced individualistic arguments about personal freedom. The new left is defined as a mix of marxism and libertianism. Race and sexual issues become more important than class and economic ones. The idea of sexual revolution justified itself through ideas of people like John Stuart Mill who in 1858 wrote a book on liberty : " Liberty consists in doing what one desires. " No other line encapsulates better the sexual revolution than this.
Mill advocated for a form of radical individualism that created adversial relationship between the individual and society. Mill's ideas were far from the only philosophy that drove the sexual revolution. Some psychologists, writers and scientists pushed it. Alfred Kinsey originally an insect zoologist. Paid by the CIA backed Rockefeller foundation to change his research to humans. He authored books like : " Sexual behavior in the human male " The book claimed that sexuality was a spectrum and people should be able to identify as whatever they want. He created the Kinsey scale which asserted that people don't fit into by binary sexual categories. John Money performed transgender experiments to try to proof that gender was socially constructed. This in volved forcing a young boy to live as a girl and having him perform sexual acts on his own twin brother. Both twins had lifelong trauma from this experiment and would later commit suicide. These brothers were Brian and David Reimer. Theodore Adorno is the author of the " Authoritarian personality " that declared all people with traditional sexual values as potential fascists. The purpose of the book was to pathologize people who preferred normal sexual views and family life. Traditional family was identified as something that created fascism. Genderless family model had to take its place to protect democracy. That's really what the book says. Michel Foucault was french homosexual and pro pedophilia writer who petitioned to abolish its age of consent laws and demanded that children be given the individual freedom to consent to sex with adults. His writings were a major influence on European branch of sexual Revolution. Freedom was the excuse and justification but a more realistic look at their philosophy could simply looking at them as perverts looking for any excuse to normalize their behavior.
The right wing response to the sexual revolution was weak. Sincre WW2, conservatices adopted liberal notions of individual liberty and anti authoritarianism because of wold war and battle with communism. They ignored how capitalistic companies were directly using sexual degeneracies for profit. Their argument against authoritarian communism undermined their own ability to oregulate culture in the US. Also let's face it : many of the conservatices were more concerned abotu conserving their money than conserving traditional values. Today they gave up on governing and adopted libertarianism. Seeing the fruits of the sexual revolution, it's just a failure. Illetimacy rates were less than 10% in 1960 and in the 2010s they rose to above 40%. Among the consequences : increasing crime and lowering educational attainment. Family formation became hard in modern America. Decline of family structure led to mental illness, suicide, drug use. Male suicide in particulary increased because male role in society is now unclear. Men went from being leaders of Western civilization to cogs in a genderless machine. Female's anti depressant use and victimhood of rape are much higher today than in the patriarchal model. Feminism and free love led to more rapes and crimes against women. Crime and child abuse exploded in the 1960s and remain high today. Almost 70 million of abortions since Roe vs Wade decision in 1973. Birth rates are going down. Wang Huning, Chinese political scientist observed about America : " The individual has replaced the family as the cell of society. In spirit, the family is being hollowed out. " He wrote it in " America against America ". " Fragmentation of the family has deprived society of many human feelings, which is also detrimental to a harmonious society. " Only people who benefited from the sexual revolution are those who hated the family, hated Christianity and wanted a mindless society of atomized individuals with no moral standards.
This kind of soceity is easier to control and corrupt than a virtuous and dutiful o ne. Accusations of racism, homophobia, etc.. aren't part of moral code but used to shut down any rational discussion and assert power over other. Inherent flaws of American founding liberalism never went away.

Ils vont tous pouvoir tenir compagnie au maître du goulag.

C'est pas un secondaire de AntoineForum ce mec?