Sujet résolu
L'auteur a trouvé une solution à son problème.
Sponsorisé
Connectez-vous pour masquer les pubsle minimum serait de les condamner à mort eux et toutes leurs familles, des parents jusqu'aux cousins en passant par les oncles
il y a 2 heures
le minimum serait de les condamner à mort eux et toutes leurs familles, des parents jusqu'aux cousins en passant par les oncles
Ils auront le gîte et le couvert
Rejoignez le #feet-club
il y a 2 heures
Post sur X
Épiphénomène
un regrettable malentendu
3 ans fermes car la justice est intransigeant
Importé en encore plus
Importé en encore plus
il y a 2 heures
L'article est bizarrement écrit. Surtout la fin
À chaque solution son problème.
il y a 2 heures
Sponsorisé
Connectez-vous pour masquer les pubsles casiers judiciaires des 4 accusés
Accused 1
5. He was 32 years old when the offences were committed. He completed grade 6 at school. He initially worked with his uncle selling fruit and vegetables. He fell foul of the law at the young age of 12 years. From that age he was cared for by his aunt because his mother worked long hours. While at a youth centre, he completed grade 12.
6. He is the father of two boys, aged 5 and 6 yrs. He attempted to pay maintenance for his children from money that he obtained from the commission of crime.
7. He has admitted the following previous convictions:
7.1. On 6 August 1997, he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 5 months imprisonment that was suspended for 5 years;
7.2. On 16 January 1997, he was convicted of theft and the sentence was postponed;
7.3. On 13 August 1998, he was convicted of possession of drugs and the sentence was postponed;
7.4. On 6 August 1999, he was convicted of housebreaking with intent to steal and theft and was warned and discharged;
7.5. On 16 August 1999, he was convicted of three counts of theft and of housebreaking and the sentence was postponed but later he was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment;
7.6. On 10 November 1999, he was convicted of escaping or attempting to escape from custody and the sentence was postponed but he was later sentenced to 12 months imprisonment;
7.7. On 10 February 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking, theft and attempting to escape from custody and he was sent to a rehabilitation school and sentenced to 30 days imprisonment;
7.8. On 2 February 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and the sentence was postponed;
7.9. On 1 August 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment;
7.10. On 12 October 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment with 6 months thereof suspended;
7.11. On 10 July 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment which was suspended but later the sentence was put into operation on 20 November 2000;
7.12. On 11 September 2003, he was convicted of two counts of theft and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and he was warned in terms of section 286;
7.13. He was released on parole on 21 January 2010 and then parole was withdrawn on 21 December 2012
7.14. On 25 March 2011, he was convicted of possession of drugs and sentenced to 4 months imprisonment suspended for 5 years;
7.15. On 28 March 2014, he was convicted of possession of drugs and a fine of R100 was imposed;
7.16. On 24 February 2015, he was convicted of escaping from custody and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment;
7.17. On 15 June 2016, he was convicted of contempt of court for failing to attend court and a fine of R100 was imposed.
Accused 2
8. Accused 2 is 28 years old. He has two younger siblings. His father was a bus driver but he passed away in 2013. He finished grade 9 at school. He became exposed to gangsterism at school. He was compelled to join the gang for his own safety. He has 2 children by Ms Johnson and one by another woman. They are aged 6, 8 and 12 years.
9. He earned R700 per week as a casual worker on a farm but his main source of income was from crime. He paid maintenance for his children from the proceeds of crime. He was released on parole in April 2015.
10. His advocate argued that he co-operated with the court in that he admitted his guilt when he testified even though he pleaded not guilty. It was also submitted that his testimony strengthened the state’s case. A further submission is that he took responsibility for his actions and showed remorse by admitting his guilt during his testimony.
11. It was submitted on his behalf that there are no substantial and compelling circumstances present but he asked that the sentences imposed on him be ordered to run concurrently.
12. He admitted his previous convictions which are as follows:
12.1. On 18 November 2009, he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment suspended for 3 years and he was declared unfit to possess a firearm;
12.2. On 6 February 2013, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment;
12.3. On 8 July 2014, he was convicted of possession of stolen goods and sentenced to 9 months imprisonment;
Accused 3
13. He is 28 years old. He has 5 siblings and he is the eldest. He lives with his parents. He completed grade 5 at school. He is not in a meaningful relationship with a woman and has no children.
14. He is currently serving a sentence for robbery with aggravating circumstances for which he was convicted on 28 August 2013.The circumstances in which that robbery was committed is that he and his co accused threatened the complainant with a knife and robbed him of R25 00,00 cash.
15. The probation officer’s report in that case states that the accused‘s parents abused alcohol and that he lived in poverty and only worked for 5 months. It also states that he abused drugs since the age of 13 and he commits crime to feed his drug habit.
16. He worked for three months at a construction company, prior to the imposition of the sentence that he is currently serving.
17. On his behalf it was submitted that there are no substantial and compelling circumstances present. It was submitted that the attempted murder and murder were not premeditated. It was further submitted that the heinous nature of the offences shouldn’t displace the consideration of other mitigating factors.
Accused 4
18. He is 29 years old. He was cared for by both his parents and was taught to be respectful. He was well nurtured and received everything that a child required.
19. Although his father consumed alcohol, there were no family problems.
20. His upbringing was a pleasant and happy one.
21. He was quiet with a stuttering problem while growing up.
22. He has one younger sister. He completed grade 11 at school.
23. His life went downward when he consumed drugs and associated with the wrong company.
24. He has a 5 year old son and his mother helps maintain the child who lives with the child’s mother.
25. On his behalf, the following were alleged to constitute substantial and compelling circumstances:
25.1. His personal circumstances;
25.2. The fact that he confessed to robbing Marsh;
25.3. He didn’t wield a dangerous weapon during the robbery;
25.4. He didn’t inflict grievious bodily harm nor threaten to do so to Marsh and the deceased;
25.5. He is an awaiting trial prisoner for one year and 5 months;
25.6. He is a first offender for robbery with aggravating circumstances;
25.7. His involvement in the offences was minimal;
25.8. He walked away from the group and that disassociation should count in his favour;
25.9. He is allegedly a suitable candidate for rehabilitation.
26. His previous convictions are as follows:
26.1. On 14 September 2006 he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced 12 months imprisonment which was suspended for three years;
26.2. On 8 November 2007 he was convicted of theft and possession of drugs and sentenced to 4 months imprisonment;
26.3. On 11 August 2011 he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment which was suspended for 5 years as well as 6 months correctional supervision and 24 hour community service;
26.4. On 28 August 2013 he was convicted of attempted housebreaking and was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment which was suspended for five years;
26.5. On 20 May 2015 he was convicted of two counts of theft and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment;
26.6. On 23 June 2015 he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment which was suspended for 3 years;
26.7. On 5 September 2016 he was convicted of possession of drugs and was warned and discharged.
Accused 1
5. He was 32 years old when the offences were committed. He completed grade 6 at school. He initially worked with his uncle selling fruit and vegetables. He fell foul of the law at the young age of 12 years. From that age he was cared for by his aunt because his mother worked long hours. While at a youth centre, he completed grade 12.
6. He is the father of two boys, aged 5 and 6 yrs. He attempted to pay maintenance for his children from money that he obtained from the commission of crime.
7. He has admitted the following previous convictions:
7.1. On 6 August 1997, he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 5 months imprisonment that was suspended for 5 years;
7.2. On 16 January 1997, he was convicted of theft and the sentence was postponed;
7.3. On 13 August 1998, he was convicted of possession of drugs and the sentence was postponed;
7.4. On 6 August 1999, he was convicted of housebreaking with intent to steal and theft and was warned and discharged;
7.5. On 16 August 1999, he was convicted of three counts of theft and of housebreaking and the sentence was postponed but later he was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment;
7.6. On 10 November 1999, he was convicted of escaping or attempting to escape from custody and the sentence was postponed but he was later sentenced to 12 months imprisonment;
7.7. On 10 February 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking, theft and attempting to escape from custody and he was sent to a rehabilitation school and sentenced to 30 days imprisonment;
7.8. On 2 February 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and the sentence was postponed;
7.9. On 1 August 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment;
7.10. On 12 October 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment with 6 months thereof suspended;
7.11. On 10 July 2000, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment which was suspended but later the sentence was put into operation on 20 November 2000;
7.12. On 11 September 2003, he was convicted of two counts of theft and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and he was warned in terms of section 286;
7.13. He was released on parole on 21 January 2010 and then parole was withdrawn on 21 December 2012
7.14. On 25 March 2011, he was convicted of possession of drugs and sentenced to 4 months imprisonment suspended for 5 years;
7.15. On 28 March 2014, he was convicted of possession of drugs and a fine of R100 was imposed;
7.16. On 24 February 2015, he was convicted of escaping from custody and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment;
7.17. On 15 June 2016, he was convicted of contempt of court for failing to attend court and a fine of R100 was imposed.
Accused 2
8. Accused 2 is 28 years old. He has two younger siblings. His father was a bus driver but he passed away in 2013. He finished grade 9 at school. He became exposed to gangsterism at school. He was compelled to join the gang for his own safety. He has 2 children by Ms Johnson and one by another woman. They are aged 6, 8 and 12 years.
9. He earned R700 per week as a casual worker on a farm but his main source of income was from crime. He paid maintenance for his children from the proceeds of crime. He was released on parole in April 2015.
10. His advocate argued that he co-operated with the court in that he admitted his guilt when he testified even though he pleaded not guilty. It was also submitted that his testimony strengthened the state’s case. A further submission is that he took responsibility for his actions and showed remorse by admitting his guilt during his testimony.
11. It was submitted on his behalf that there are no substantial and compelling circumstances present but he asked that the sentences imposed on him be ordered to run concurrently.
12. He admitted his previous convictions which are as follows:
12.1. On 18 November 2009, he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 5 years imprisonment suspended for 3 years and he was declared unfit to possess a firearm;
12.2. On 6 February 2013, he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment;
12.3. On 8 July 2014, he was convicted of possession of stolen goods and sentenced to 9 months imprisonment;
Accused 3
13. He is 28 years old. He has 5 siblings and he is the eldest. He lives with his parents. He completed grade 5 at school. He is not in a meaningful relationship with a woman and has no children.
14. He is currently serving a sentence for robbery with aggravating circumstances for which he was convicted on 28 August 2013.The circumstances in which that robbery was committed is that he and his co accused threatened the complainant with a knife and robbed him of R25 00,00 cash.
15. The probation officer’s report in that case states that the accused‘s parents abused alcohol and that he lived in poverty and only worked for 5 months. It also states that he abused drugs since the age of 13 and he commits crime to feed his drug habit.
16. He worked for three months at a construction company, prior to the imposition of the sentence that he is currently serving.
17. On his behalf it was submitted that there are no substantial and compelling circumstances present. It was submitted that the attempted murder and murder were not premeditated. It was further submitted that the heinous nature of the offences shouldn’t displace the consideration of other mitigating factors.
Accused 4
18. He is 29 years old. He was cared for by both his parents and was taught to be respectful. He was well nurtured and received everything that a child required.
19. Although his father consumed alcohol, there were no family problems.
20. His upbringing was a pleasant and happy one.
21. He was quiet with a stuttering problem while growing up.
22. He has one younger sister. He completed grade 11 at school.
23. His life went downward when he consumed drugs and associated with the wrong company.
24. He has a 5 year old son and his mother helps maintain the child who lives with the child’s mother.
25. On his behalf, the following were alleged to constitute substantial and compelling circumstances:
25.1. His personal circumstances;
25.2. The fact that he confessed to robbing Marsh;
25.3. He didn’t wield a dangerous weapon during the robbery;
25.4. He didn’t inflict grievious bodily harm nor threaten to do so to Marsh and the deceased;
25.5. He is an awaiting trial prisoner for one year and 5 months;
25.6. He is a first offender for robbery with aggravating circumstances;
25.7. His involvement in the offences was minimal;
25.8. He walked away from the group and that disassociation should count in his favour;
25.9. He is allegedly a suitable candidate for rehabilitation.
26. His previous convictions are as follows:
26.1. On 14 September 2006 he was convicted of housebreaking and theft and sentenced 12 months imprisonment which was suspended for three years;
26.2. On 8 November 2007 he was convicted of theft and possession of drugs and sentenced to 4 months imprisonment;
26.3. On 11 August 2011 he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment which was suspended for 5 years as well as 6 months correctional supervision and 24 hour community service;
26.4. On 28 August 2013 he was convicted of attempted housebreaking and was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment which was suspended for five years;
26.5. On 20 May 2015 he was convicted of two counts of theft and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment;
26.6. On 23 June 2015 he was convicted of theft and sentenced to 12 months imprisonment which was suspended for 3 years;
26.7. On 5 September 2016 he was convicted of possession of drugs and was warned and discharged.
Foufinet ?
il y a 2 heures
Post sur X
Aya les gueules de porte bonheur
Pourquoi on trimballe ça dans un tribunal en vrai....
Pourquoi on trimballe ça dans un tribunal en vrai....
#realite-virtuelle join me on the other side ( ou pas )
il y a 2 heures
le minimum serait de les condamner à mort eux et toutes leurs familles, des parents jusqu'aux cousins en passant par les oncles
L’oncle qui a couper totalement les ponts avec sa famille de cinglés pour aller à l’autre bout du pays qui finit avec une balle dans la tête sans savoir la raison
il y a 2 heures
le verdict (faut additionner les années de taule)
ah bah non, prison à vie
1. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
2. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 1 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
3. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
4. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 1, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
5. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1, is sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment;
6. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 1, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
7. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 1, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
8. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
9. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
10. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 1, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment.
11. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
12. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 2 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
13. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
14. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 2, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
15. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2, is sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment;
16. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 2, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
17. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 2, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
18. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
19. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
20. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 2, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment.
21. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
22. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3 is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
23. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
24. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
25. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
26. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 3, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
27. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 3, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
28. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
29. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
30. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 3, is sentenced to 8 years direct imprisonment.
31. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 4, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
32. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 4 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment, which will run concurrently with the sentence imposed for count 1;
33. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 4 is sentenced to 7 years direct imprisonment;
34. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3, is sentenced to 7 years direct imprisonment, which will run concurrently with the sentence imposed for count 3;
1. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
2. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 1 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
3. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
4. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 1, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
5. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 1, is sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment;
6. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 1, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
7. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 1, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
8. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
9. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 1, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
10. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 1, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment.
11. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
12. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 2 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
13. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
14. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 2, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
15. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 2, is sentenced to 25 years direct imprisonment;
16. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 2, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
17. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 2, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
18. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
19. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 2, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
20. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 2, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment.
21. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
22. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3 is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
23. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3 is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
24. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3, is sentenced to 10 years direct imprisonment;
25. On count 5, the attempted murder of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
26. On count 6, the rape of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 3, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
27. On count 7, the murder of Hannah Cornelius, Accused 3, is sentenced to life imprisonment;
28. On count 8, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Ncumisa Qwina, Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
29. On count 9, the robbery with aggravated circumstances of Miemie Oktober, Accused 3, is sentenced to 20 years direct imprisonment;
30. On count 10, the kidnapping of Miemie Oktober, Accused 3, is sentenced to 8 years direct imprisonment.
31. On count 1, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 4, is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment;
32. On count 2, the robbery with aggravating circumstances of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 4 is sentenced to 15 years direct imprisonment, which will run concurrently with the sentence imposed for count 1;
33. On count 3, the kidnapping of Cheslin Claud Marsh: Accused 4 is sentenced to 7 years direct imprisonment;
34. On count 4, the kidnapping of Hannah Cornelius: Accused 3, is sentenced to 7 years direct imprisonment, which will run concurrently with the sentence imposed for count 3;
Foufinet ?
il y a 2 heures
L’oncle qui a couper totalement les ponts avec sa famille de cinglés pour aller à l’autre bout du pays qui finit avec une balle dans la tête sans savoir la raison
Mérité
Rejoignez le #feet-club
il y a 2 heures
L’oncle qui a couper totalement les ponts avec sa famille de cinglés pour aller à l’autre bout du pays qui finit avec une balle dans la tête sans savoir la raison
Ayaaaaa
Arrêtez de vous prendre trop au sérieux
il y a 2 heures
Post sur X
Mais de quoi vous vous plaignez sans déconner?!
Cette action a rendu quand même 4 personnes sur 5 heureuses
Cette action a rendu quand même 4 personnes sur 5 heureuses
il y a 2 heures
tant qu on joue pas au jeu de la haine ca va
Dommage que les magalax/féministe sont souvent moches, car si elles se faisaient violer plus souvent, elle changerait leurs façon de penser
il y a 2 heures
En ligne
226
Sur ce sujet0



























